tujux
Joined 1 year ago
Joined 1 year ago
I dont think this is comparable to buying a barrel of oil at all. A software factory like this, I'm assuming is going to be run 24/7.
I get what you're saying, but thats assuming someone's buying their software at the faster pace as well, which we don't know.
Now one could say that the same feature that a customer would've paid $1M for was done in $4k instead of $160k. But buyers are going to demand much more as they see this kind of pace. You'd be able to charge maybe only $10k, because your opportunity cost goes down since you only spent 2 days; you can't keep the same margins that you needed to in order to justify spending 9 months on it. I think it gets very complicated and we're yet to see these economic effects.
AI Software Factory: $4172 / 2 days = $2086/day
This seems unsustainable, unless you're also generating 3x the revenue.
I don't know how you can say with confidence that a few hundred dollars and not marketing this wouldn't have an effect on sales.
Yes, evaluate market demand by making it more expensive and doing 0 marketing. /s
Am I crazy in thinking that doing it this way is close to meaningless?
1. Retrieval Accuracy - https://github.com/johannschopplich/toon?tab=readme-ov-file#...
2. Performance by dataset - https://github.com/johannschopplich/toon?tab=readme-ov-file#...
If its work that was blocking an existing deal, I can see this playing out in your favour. Whereas, if you were trying to negotiate a deal where you wanted the customer to pay x$ for a feature you have yet to develop, you might now have to charge lesser.