toomuchtodo

You’ll have created an autonomous Robin Hood clone army. Fun times.

Prices are down now, and will continue to decline into the future, assuming consumption decline trajectory holds.

The organization chooses to operate like this, if they wanted to fix the systematic issues, they would. It sounds, from your observations, they do not want nor intend to fix the systemic issues. You cannot solve problems the organization does not want to solve. You can provide recommendations and guidance, they choose whether to implement or fix.

Once you find your next job and you’ve safely moved on, drop a tip to Brian Krebs and let them know who it is while sticking to facts, if you’re so inclined, no obligation to do so.

> That distinction matters to us. Our long-term values include “Your data belongs to you” and “We are good stewards of your data”. The pattern we try to follow is: rather than continuously reworking our UI to follow every new trend, we give you the interfaces to use your data however it suits you. MCP continues that pattern. It’s there if you want it, and nothing changes if you don’t.

"Security is for losers"

> Andy Yen, the CEO of Proton, had a message for an employee in the company’s security Slack channel who urged the company to at least take a few days to pentest newly written code before pushing it live. “That’s bullshit and loser thinking. Of course it’s possible to be fast and secure,” Yen wrote in the channel at the end of August. “Stop thinking always of how to be slower, and focus more on how to be faster.” In a follow-up message, Yen reiterated his point: “only losers think like that.” His ultimate message for the team was to “stop lovingly handcrafting all our code and use AI more.”