royapakzad
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
I think you are right. It's very hard to have a common understanding of human values and ethics. But regarding "rights" and their universality, I should say how is it "well attested that these human rights declarations have a strong western bias?" I agree there are biases, cultural differences, etc. But, do we have any other framework that is more universal (and well-defined) than human rights? I myself am from a non-western developing country, I studied EE and also Human Rights Studies. With regards to AI and ethics, in fact, whenever I talk to non-western individuals they emphasize on the importance of human rights framework instead of abstract words such as "ethics", "values", etc.
This might surprise you but 185 countries have ratified the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women except "the US" and 6 other countries including Sudan, Somalia, etc. the US has neither ratified the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. You can find out about all the countries here, you'll be surprised: http://indicators.ohchr.org/
My point is not to speak negatively about the US and its commitment to the international human rights treaties but to mention that these treaties are more universal than you think. At a digital rights conference, I spoke with a Tunisian digital rights activist, I used a phrase "ethics in AI" and she corrected me to actually say the word "human rights." Because it has a clear framework, it has clear indicators and metrics to measure (to some extent), it's legally binding (depending on different cases and with respect to certain actors), not anybody (in this case any company) can create its own definition and interpretation.