Recent submissions

Comment · 4 years ago
One problem is that economic growth has a big correlation with carbon emissions. https://eeb.org/library/decoupling-debunked/

Environmental decoupling is the notion that we can have growth and preserve nature. For now is just a myth

edit:typos

Comment · 4 years ago
"Unless the people benefit, economic growth is a subsidy for the rich."

—Richard Falk, “Post-Mubarak Revolutionary Chances,” Al Jazeera, 22 Feb. 2011

Comment · 4 years ago
Didn't said that we can substitute industrial ammonia but it could definitely reduce it's use. Changing the way we eat it's definitely an opportunity to reduce major sources of c02 emissions.
Comment · 4 years ago
We could avoid this number by investing in soil preservation, nitrogen fixing plants, reduce meat consumption, even in concepts like humanure.
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
>It’s a common fallacy of tech people to think that all problems are of a technical nature, and that if we could just have the right technology they would go away and we would be living in a utopia. The fact is, the problems are with human behavior and any technology created will serve to further that behavior.

I agree with you. This can be applied to the solutions we are looking to solve climate change.

Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
In Portugal is "Sociedade do Cansaço" which translates to "fatigue society"
Comment · 5 years ago
I agree although I would add that many of the creative jobs although technically challenging have useless or even destructive goals. Just look at the attention economy and the surveillance industry. We try not to contemplate this fact by occupying our lives to the limit and by focusing on the "how" instead of the "why". We engineers are probably the ones who do this the most.

Funny by coincidence I bought this book just a few hours ago :)

Comment · 5 years ago
Also we could redistribute the tax as a sort of UBI. This way not only product that pollute would be more expensive, people would have the ability to say no to crappy jobs.
Comment · 5 years ago
Yes, the author focuses on a possible shortage of resources as the cause of the problem, but the Forester effect certainly played a decisive role in the case of the chip shortage. Anyway, we live in a very fragile civilization, and we have to shorten the supply chains or we will have big problems in the future.
Comment · 5 years ago
Is on this kind of measures where jevons paradox or the rebound effect kicks in. We will inclined to eat more meat because is more sustainable, and with that we neutralize the gains. Also meat from Brazil is many times dependent on Amazon deforestation, so although I love picanha, I will not eat it anymore. For those in Europe please press your government not to ratify the EU-Mercosul agreement that will increase the trade of soy meat and ethanol in exchange for Europe export more cars to America Latina. We should avoid meat and individual transports and try to invest in the local economy so this agreement doesn't make any sense

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton