imadr
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
P=/=NP -> 3SAT has no polynomial-time algorithm
ETH is true -> 3SAT has no subexponential time algorithm
ETH is false -> 3SAT has a subexponential time algorithm
------
ETH true -> P=/=NP
ETH false (!!!) -> P ?= NP remain unsolved
Why every time some person/group of people enact an anti-LLM policy in their project, other people feel the personal need to stress how useful LLMs are and how that project is bound to fail if they don't use it?
Postmarketos clearly exists and works, EVEN if LLMs were absolutely perfect for speeding up development ten folds, is there any absolute moral necessity to use them?
Also isn't this just moving the goalpost that LLM fanatics love to point out?
- 3d primitives (arrows, hemisphere)
- billboarded text rendering
- mouse interaction/canvas rendering that works for multiple scenes
It might be possible to vibe code but you’ll hit a wall of complexity really quick
The term subsurface scattering is used for light that exits further away (more than a pixel) like in simulations of human skin
However that part of the article isn’t clear enough and warrants a rewrite
Real life measures are also useful for inverse rendering.