djrhails
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
There's definitely more complexity layered in - most things in life are not as clear cut as a coin flip. However, I do tend to think the idea of thinking 'geometrically' is pretty universal.
But no one appears to have taken the risk/time to properly validate it.
- Introduction article: https://hails.info/projects/missing-words/
- Search: https://words.hails.info/
Great to see the resurgence of interest!
Moreover, the men in the integrated squads developed more egalitarian attitudes. Interestingly, these attitudes were not maintained once no longer in a mixed squad.
The drunk driving parallel I thought was more that a little amusing. A more apt comparison might just be driving itself - it's a risky activity both for yourself and the others around you. Perhaps even to the speculated 1% marker but that doesn't appear to create any sort of moral imperative to change our willingness to drive.
Equally I couldn't help notice the level of subtle anthropomorphism going on - name dropping depression as related to anhedonia is a clever literary technique for encouraging this natural thought pattern; even while adding the "perhaps", "some think" it makes no difference to the "bias ... easily distorting our intuitions".
I'd love to see a similar essay for plants - or even the AI that they mention. I could see the outline for an equally persuasive essay (a shame that the author sees AI being trivially less likely to be sentient - one I have trouble believing beyond a "biological bias")
Mining at a rate necessary to get any reasonable amount of Ether is a huge investment, and is already out of reach for the average person. Setting your desktop computer to mine definitely won't pay for your small smart contract.
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/djrhails; my proof: https://keybase.io/djrhails/sigs/LWSTYuHmFqxHPhAXkZPOCfJVq8QsdjNvA8BPlSJwfRA ]