delinquentme

Yes you're the exception.

Somehow we arent really adept at interviewing at what the day-to-day requirements of a position.

Instead were much more interested in edge-case stuff like bubble sort.

I wonder if this is some assessment of "are they capable of substantially more complex tasks, and if so, safe to assume they're capable of less-complex minutiae.

Seems about right, as often these evaluation type things are proxies.

Generic HR inbox?

I don't think you're actually concerned about this.

Remember:

At this point in our technological competency, all easy advancements are gone.

Oh wait.

Social Justice nonsense.

Look at the systems which reward X behavior in Y sex.

Assuming that access to partners is a primary behavioral motivator ( it is, it just is ). Then what rewards exist for women undertaking novel enterprises?

Very little. Or substantially less compared to males.

The systems running internal to humans don't preference the sex-barganing position of a woman when shes got money / power which comes with starting companies.

More simply:

Power / money doesn't beget better mate-optionality for women in the same way it benefits men -- so why would she do it?

Please stop the ignorant pandering.

contact info?

"Importantly, our work on rodent blood exchange establishes that blood age has virtually immediate effects on regeneration of all three germ layer derivatives."

Would love to chat with him!

Im interested in chatting on versioning in this data ( and possibly by extension, compression ) . Happen to have a method to contact you ?

"Dietary restriction just isn't in us." like ... unsure how to respond to this... Like its just so blatantly wrong. source: me, a person whos maintained substantially fasted states for long periods of time

why doesn't this commend have upvote arrows?

"How is the pharmaceutical industry responding to its difficulties? One could hope drug companies would decide to make some changes—trim their prices ..." It seems this, extrapolation, or "logical next step" well encapsulates what the writer knows on the topic of pharma. On what planet would one derive this conclusion from the precursor of lessening profits?

"ridiculously well-served already with regards to delivering packages" ... is this the locker? If not, Im curious ! More plz!