Look at the systems which reward X behavior in Y sex.
Assuming that access to partners is a primary behavioral motivator ( it is, it just is ). Then what rewards exist for women undertaking novel enterprises?
Very little. Or substantially less compared to males.
The systems running internal to humans don't preference the sex-barganing position of a woman when shes got money / power which comes with starting companies.
More simply:
Power / money doesn't beget better mate-optionality for women in the same way it benefits men -- so why would she do it?
Look at the systems which reward X behavior in Y sex.
Assuming that access to partners is a primary behavioral motivator ( it is, it just is ). Then what rewards exist for women undertaking novel enterprises?
Very little. Or substantially less compared to males.
The systems running internal to humans don't preference the sex-barganing position of a woman when shes got money / power which comes with starting companies.
More simply:
Power / money doesn't beget better mate-optionality for women in the same way it benefits men -- so why would she do it?
Please stop the ignorant pandering.