cconcepts

Not just New Zealand but....somewhere in central Otago...of all places?

The article has an overlay wanting me to put in my email address. Can't seem to close it with the X in the corner. S9 Android with Chrome browser. Renders the website useless unless I put in my email

Using "primo" and "buggering" like that: I think I spotted a Kiwi?

Interesting to me that Shackelton and the Endurance keep popping up on HN. I happened to read "South" some years ago and it had a big impact on me as someone who loves the outdoors.

I just didn't expect it to keep popping up in a technology focussed community. Yet I can see the appeal. The sheer determination of Shackelton and crew should be inspiring to all people.

There were a couple of points I keep thinking about:

SPOILER ALERT

1) Where they are navigating broken ice on a heaving ocean and Shackelton casually mentions that he hadn't slept for over 100 hours as he was trying to pick a safe route through the ice (I expect people would argue that is highly likely to kill/drive you insane).

2) Where a wave breaks on top of their small boat that is so high that they can't hear it yet and Shackelton initially thinks the white crest way above them is actually a break in the sky indicating clearing weather.

And I have a sore neck because my keyboard/monitor arrangement isn't optimized.

The Book "South" which is something like an edited version of Shackelton's diary, has this journey in reasonable detail. It had a profound impact on me; that people could be that tough and resilient against massive odds. I think about it often when I am feeling stressed - how would someone like Shackelton handle this so the fear didn't impair their judgement.

I agree, was recently using it in a remote area for reasonably important decision making. The high level of detail fooled me into thinking it had a high level of accuracy.

Turns out being very specifically wrong is more convincing than just being generally wrong.

EDIT: I should add that windy may be the best forecasting app there is. I was more commenting on the fact that the specificity made me follow it blindly when I should have been treating it like any other forecast.

Not many HN comments make me laugh out loud, but this did

Am surprised sites like the one linked don't get dis-incentivized from running so many ads by aggregators like HN with some formula that essentially makes it harder for links with more ads to get to the front page?

Maybe thats unfair and just "let the people decide" is the best method but 'wow!' am running adblock and that thing is still a sensory overload.

I recently bought a secondhand Original DJI Mavic Pro for chump change. For someone who knew nothing about drones it staggered me. For something so technologically advanced to be considered 'old' tech (manufactured 2017) is just unreal.

It is now my frame of reference for all sorts of technology. Automatically not crashing, auto return to home, insane maneuverability on sport mode and all at a bizarrely low price for something that would have seemed science fiction to many punters 20 years ago.

By commoditizing this kind of consumer tech that interfaces with the real world, DJI has changed my perception of what existing technology could be capable of and changed the way I consider usability in my own work.

Hilarious: need a way to tag stuff I see on linkedin to automatically post it to shlinkedin. Something like #nottheonion

There is so much hilarious content not being appreciated over on the original.

I hope you guys slay the market and are able to keep up with the demand that is coming at you.

I hope this is the Tesla moment for the consumer electronics industry where the incumbents are forced, through the hubris yet popularity of an upstart, to start innovating again and doing what is good for humanity rather than peddling incrementally changed products each year that are designed to become obsolete within an ever-shortening timeframe because....it appears to be good for the bottom line.

Good on you

A couple of things:

1) Isn't the default answer to a question headline supposed to be "No"?

2) How is one supposed to sift the wheat from the chaff these days? Everyone uses terms like "scientists agree that" and "here's a list of studies supporting my point of view". I took Ivermectin seriously because of Brett W etc (and perhaps I still should) but as humans we need heuristics, people who we can trust to give us well researched info, otherwise each and everyone of us needs to be an experienced researcher in every field to have any confidence of the "facts". I don't have time for that - I have a living to make, kids to spend time with, sleep to have....where are the smart people that we can trust?

Sorry Dang, I know this is kinda off topic but....kinda not?

Progressiveness for its own sake is weird attitude western culture is buying into. I have posted this quote before on HN but you might find it relevant:

"In the matter of reforming things, as distinct from deforming them, there is one plain and simple principle; a principle which will probably be called a paradox. There exists in such a case a certain institution or law; let us say, for the sake of simplicity, a fence or gate erected across a road. The more modern type of reformer goes gaily up to it and says, “I don’t see the use of this; let us clear it away.” To which the more intelligent type of reformer will do well to answer: “If you don’t see the use of it, I certainly won’t let you clear it away. Go away and think. Then, when you can come back and tell me that you do see the use of it, I may allow you to destroy it." G.K. Chesterton - The Drift from Domesticity