Recent submissions

Comment · 1 day ago
Comment · 5 days ago
> Dr Xu, an optical engineering researcher at the National University of Singapore, reportedly responded to the LinkedIn post. According to Nature, Dr Xu accepted that he had used an AI model to assist with post-processing but denied breaking the rules of the competition, which clearly state that “AI-generated videos are not permitted.”

> “It was applied afterwards to the reconstructed grayscale data to distinguish and color structures with similar morphology,” he wrote.

> However, Dr Xu’s messages on the LinkedIn post can’t be found as of today (October 1), and his LinkedIn profile now appears to have been deleted entirely.

> Scientists have repeatedly said that the issue could be resolved if Dr Xu shares his RAW grayscale video.

Comment · 7 days ago
Comment · 9 days ago
Comment · 10 days ago
But they grew much bigger still thanks to illegal tacticts. So the very fact that it's a sizable portion of 2018's revenue but not of today's revenue shows how incitated they are to keep going the same path.
Comment · 12 days ago
Still not an explanation.
Comment · 12 days ago
Personally I switched to zellij and haven't looked back. Though any of them is worth it over nothing.
Comment · 13 days ago
I think it's more of a proof that youtube's search and recommendations algorithm is rubbish.
Comment · 17 days ago
The fact that Ledger uses resellers is crazy.

The fact that some people can put million dollars worth of crypto on a device, but can't buy a plane ticket to someone to get the device straight from the factory is crazy.

The fact that puri.sm has better anti interdiction practices than Ledger is crazy : https://puri.sm/posts/anti-interdiction-update-six-month-ret...

> Before Ledger publicly confirmed the hardware implant, former Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpelès reported examining a suspicious Ledger Nano X device obtained from Malaysia. On October 9, Karpelès described finding an additional electronic component hidden behind the device’s display, inside material normally used to protect the screen.

> He reported that the wallet had arrived in packaging that appeared intact, raising questions about whether customers could identify a modified device through a routine visual inspection. In photographs shared publicly, the component appeared to contain electronic circuitry separate from the wallet’s original hardware

Come on.

Comment · 18 days ago
Comment · 19 days ago
Comment · 19 days ago
Comment · 20 days ago
Comment · 21 days ago
What's "podunk"?

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton