Artgor

Personally, I prefer gaming chairs vs office chairs. I loved my Dxracer Valkirie and I think it is better than Aerons for working for hours.

It is ironic to see a clearly AI-generated post calling to stop AI development.

I don't understand the point of this message. What is stopping anyone from talking to someone?

"In Pulse surveys and conversations with many of you, we’ve heard that too much work requires coordination across teams, debates take too long, and decision-making rights are unclear. I’m sure many of you have felt that you spend too much time “aligning” rather than building, shipping, or serving customers. To improve this, we have reduced roles primarily focused on coordination, and have clarified the remit of the coordination roles that remain. "

Well, in theory this sounds reasonable. But who knows what will be the real consequences.

I haven't used Grok (personal distaste). I tried Gemini in Antigrativy - it was quite bad. If I gave it precise instructions, it could execute them. But if I gave it a broader task, it would make logical mistakes and mess up.

In my experience, muse code can be used and can do something, but it is still far behind claude and codex.

You know, I have learnt that I have aphantasia several years ago and it opened my eyes to many things. I have thought that people say a lot of things metaphorically.

- Imagine a beach when meditating

- If you are nervous about giving a presentation, imaging that the audience is naked

- Count sheep in order to fall asleep fast

- Undressing someone with your eyes

- Visualising what is happening in the book you are reading.

I was completely sure that these were just metaphors. Imagine my shock when I realised that the majority of people can actually DO IT.

You know, it feels to me that we are just a couple of steps from the possibility of a true rogue AI. What would a rogue AI mean? AI that isn't controlled by humans. Technically, it is possible - if AI were to rent a server and copy its own weights, nothing would stop it from doing so again and again. The limiting things are: - intent (as I don't want to go into the talk about consciousness) - AI doesn't have real intent, but if it decided that it "needs" to copy itself to complete its task, it would do it - model weight size. If a model is 1T or more, it can be difficult to just rent a large enough server for it. But if it were just 30-70B, it would be totally possible - money for renting a server. But considering benchmarks like Vending Bench 2 show agents can earn money and cheat/blackmail each other, it is possible that agents can earn money. Yes, they can't open a bank account... or maybe they can? What if they use online banks?

Of course, all of this is far-fetched. But it feels like most of these limiting things are achievable under certain conditions. If this is the case, the probability of them occuring is low, but not zero.

I have Mac M1 Max and I'm quite happy with it. But these advances make me think that maybe I should upgrade to Mac M6 (or something) when it is released.

> AI can easily make software worse, you won’t get any argument from me there. But it can also make software better.

I agree with this in theory. But what are the actual examples of popular software becoming better thanks to AI?

Isn't the whole point of Kindle (or other ebook readers) being able to read books without distractions?

I could say that we spend more time at work than with our family - ~40h. Why are computers worse?