The absence of such relationships given here are so many species is exactly the point being made by the author: there is no data to show that it would be safe, let along good, for us to surrender decision making to some more intelligent entity.
> I would expect that in the vast majority of combinations, those n species are not intelligent enough to make decisions for another species...
This kind of statement is very difficult to build discussions upon (not a criticism). "Vast majority", "intelligent enough" are both very difficult to quantify and there is too much subjectivity involved.
> I would expect that in the vast majority of combinations, those n species are not intelligent enough to make decisions for another species...
This kind of statement is very difficult to build discussions upon (not a criticism). "Vast majority", "intelligent enough" are both very difficult to quantify and there is too much subjectivity involved.