shikwasa
Joined 1 month ago
Karma
4
Submissions
4
Member since
Sep 21
Recent submissions
Comment · 28 days ago
Just want to say thank you for the absolutely amazing and generous comment! :)
Comment · 1 month ago
I understand the "starting point" part but I find the emphasis on "classless" interesting: you basically have to introduce a non-element selector as soon as you want make even the smallest layout change.
For anything beyond a single page document, I find something like matcha.css (https://matcha.mizu.sh, you can even pick your custom build on the same page) a practical starting point if you want to stay close to the elements.
Comment · 1 month ago
The absence of such relationships given here are so many species is exactly the point being made by the author: there is no data to show that it would be safe, let along good, for us to surrender decision making to some more intelligent entity.
> I would expect that in the vast majority of combinations, those n species are not intelligent enough to make decisions for another species...
This kind of statement is very difficult to build discussions upon (not a criticism). "Vast majority", "intelligent enough" are both very difficult to quantify and there is too much subjectivity involved.
Comment · 1 month ago
I think the quoted part is saying that given n species and the n * (n - 1) binary combinations possible, there are no examples of the said observation. It doesn't suggest "the set of intelligent species only [has] one member".