>I genuinely do not know who I am supposed to have identified or which phrases I published are said to have identified them, in combination with [details] in the public domain.
>How I genuinely do not know who I am supposed to have identified or which phrases I published are said to have identified them, in combination with [details] in the public domain.
How on earth is that open and shut?
Open and shut would be if he published the names, which nobody claims that he did.
Conveniently it is also impossible to verify if the crime was actually committed without naming the individuals. All that is required to convict is one judge's say so.
If you were to pick a convenient politically motivated prosecution this ranks up there with navalny skipping bail by dint of being in a coma.
>How I genuinely do not know who I am supposed to have identified or which phrases I published are said to have identified them, in combination with [details] in the public domain.
How on earth is that open and shut?
Open and shut would be if he published the names, which nobody claims that he did.
Conveniently it is also impossible to verify if the crime was actually committed without naming the individuals. All that is required to convict is one judge's say so.
If you were to pick a convenient politically motivated prosecution this ranks up there with navalny skipping bail by dint of being in a coma.