I knew nothing of this case until today but it seems like he breached an injunction against reporting the identity of complainants or information that could lead to their identification. From the little bit of reading I’ve done it seems pretty like an open and shut case (and I actually went into my reading expecting my be on Murray’s side).
Can anybody explain why there is an injustice here? Almost every comment I see here in his favour gives no reason why this is unjust.
Can anybody explain why there is an injustice here? Almost every comment I see here in his favour gives no reason why this is unjust.