pydry

Not sure what the LLM is adding there then other than injecting a step into your search that could hallucinate.

Half of the value in open source was that it was used by lots of people and all of the nasty edge cases and bugs have been ironed out.

If LLMs were performing according to hype then yes, virtually all paid software would be gone by now and there would be a high quality FOSS equivalent of all of it.

Theyre also inclined to jump into talking about solutions rather than their actual problem which inhibits analysis of the problem.

and now there are 20x as many demanding maintenance everything is 20x better.

megacorps not paying taxes is kind of like a backdoor inserted into code.

the lawmakers know exactly what theyre doing but they'll throw their hands up in their and claim it was an accident or unavoidable if challenged. the people who perpetuate their narrative are an intrinsic part of how this process functions.

The quality drop off when vibe coding something novel is pretty sharp. LLMs lean heavily on the existence of relevant training material.

Companies which are ok losing $80 billion in Q1 and Q2 can do that.

If you deregulated it and made it pay for its own disaster insurance it would stop existing.

Without price anderson act dumping the liability on to taxpayers nobody would build nuclear reactors even at the cost they are.

Whenever redis, mysql or postgres rear their head it raises all sorts of ugly questions like do you let apps share databases, how do you do backups, etc.

For apps that will have 1-3 users and a few hits a day a sqlite file is far less operational overhead and can be backed up with all of the other files that app has.

isn't it a nightmare running home assistant with kubernetes? i had a bad enough time just using docker compose.

In 2026 it's barely concealed racism - an islamophobic trope that doesnt get called out enough.

Sundar Pichai will need to take a class from Dario in open source fearmongering.

How? Addictive food is profitable food is it not?

I agree that no conspiracy is necessary, basic market incentives dictate that addictive "once you pop you can't stop" food is just good business.

I was perfectly clear.

I suspected that somebody might read what I wrote and interpret it as "attaching your name automatically reduces the toxicity of social networks".