Recent submissions

Comment · 1 day ago
To be fair, based on the profit margins indicated in DeepSeek’s reports, a $500 API credit might only cost them $5 to provide.
Comment · 11 days ago
Welcome to the AI era, every week in the near future
Comment · 15 days ago
z.ai was not alibaba. z.ai got glm and alibaba got qwen
Comment · 1 month ago
Because they already did so. The model in Codex will get lower `juice` than API version.
Comment · 1 month ago
Maybe show respect to OpenAI DevDay
Comment · 1 month ago
And the LLM say: "You're absolutely right! We didn't need jaggederest's service. We can build it easily."
Comment · 2 months ago
There's no new page for this model. Hackernews didn't allow the same link be posted twice.
Comment · 2 months ago
Just after DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 published, is this on purpose?
Comment · 4 months ago
I suspect this isn't a malfunction, but rather a deliberate measure designed to counter so-called distillation attacks.
Comment · 4 months ago
So we will get GPT 5.6 soon?
Comment · 1 year ago
I should like to know how much this would cost? Even Claude's largest subscription appears insufficient for such token requirements.
Comment · 1 year ago
Maybe using mmap would also save some memory, I'm not quite sure if this can be implemented in Python.
Comment · 1 year ago
I checked your past submissions and yes, they are also ai generated.

I know it's the age of ai, but one should do a little checking oneself before posting ai generated content, right? Or at least one should know how to use git and write meaningful commit messages?

Comment · 1 year ago
Frankly, I think this program is ai generated.

1. there are hallucinatory descriptions in the Readme (make test), and also in the code, such as the rate limit set at line 158, which is the wrong number

2. all commits are done on github webui, checking the signature confirms this

3. too verbose function names and a 2000 line python file

I don't have a complaint about ai, but the code quality clearly needs improvement, the license only lists a few common examples, the thresholds for detection seem to be set randomly, _get_stargazers_graphql the entire function is commented out and performs no action, it says "Currently bypassed by get_ stargazers", did you generate the code without even reading through it?

Bad code like this gets over 100stars, it seems like you're doing a satirical fake-star performance art.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton