zodzedzi
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
This conclusion sounds like quite the leap.
Even if the two observations they generated turned out to be 100% ironclad true, generalizing to "speakers of different languages" as a title and "linguistic diversity" from observing just two languages seems like a big jump.
Like a simulation algorithm? Can you elaborate on what kind of algo and the problem it solved?
How does heapsort protect against a stack attack?
It certainly has the overall feel and appeal of being done by hand, but I'm not sure.
If it's software, does anyone know which software, what's the name of this style, etc?
I don't think Uber has anything to fear from Waymo:
(1) It will take years for Waymo to ramp up to "independence" scale. How many cars do they have now, and how many would they need? How long will it take them to negotiate new regulations with every city and state? 5 years?
(2) This deal is probably not exclusive. Uber can strike a similar deal with Cruise as well. Uber becomes the Amazon of driving services, a platform gating access, with all the data.
(3) Having a big money company behind them is good. And if Waymo acquires Uber in 3 years, it's not necessarily a bad thing for Uber.
They can start adding support one city at a time. And for the Uber user, the Waymo option only pops up for you if the ride you requested is within the Waymo range and they have cars available.
This way they can also collect tons of data about how users respond to the offers, affinity to driverless cars per region, price elasticity, etc. And then dial the supply up or down as they wish. They can even start covering a city with just two cars if they wanted to, and then build popularity and word of mouth.
On the other hand if they started with their own app, the lack of car coverage in most areas (due to low car supply, pending regulations, etc) would quickly frustrate users who would then switch to another app, so user retention would be a nightmare.
Not to mention side-stepping all the customer-facing operations of running such a business, which Alphabet does not have an affinity for.
Are these higher order concepts accessible to us? E.g. can we list those learned concepts?
(Re-reading the paper you linked now...)
And you're right, according to their changelog [1], they added it in 11.3.
>> v 11.3rc1 + Contextual policies (different capabilities for the same origin, depending on the top-level domain) configurable in the CUSTOM panel (thanks NLnet for financial support)
Woohoo!
Thanks for following up and making me look, I now have a better setup!
Edit: Correction - I do have NoScript 11; but don't see those options.
GF2P8AFFINEQB is one of the AVX-512 CPU instructions that performs an affine transformation (essentially AX+b) on a Galois field - finite number fields used in coding theory and cryptography.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVX-512#GFNI