zitoshi
Joined 3 years ago
Joined 3 years ago
I like the frame of commodity intelligence, it makes it clear how the human is useful.
What's missing is just a true awareness of what is new information (by both the LLM + the human learning).
I also feel like there are many ways he can access compute for use of his own ideas.
But to your point, then the growth is not in the ideas that can be generated with AI, and more in the structure. Which feels like a different stage. Maybe "growth", wasn't a good word.
It actually feels like a signal that it is in a tapering phase.
As in, if it was in a growth phase a freeform, solo - collab with who you want, would be more beneficial. But in a tapering phase you'd want structure and to be in the private formal meetings.
just an idea
Would be cool if there was an images (can be Ai generated) -- with the papers... and maybe a notebookLLM link.
I'm someone who wants to consume the information in papers, but find the format of longform reading as alot of friction.
are you focused on just connecting the data? or the specific cross understanding between the different types of information?
For those more advanced and have used fable, does fable make learning this less or more necessary?
As in, can I now reliably give higher order problems like ... "we are missing a feature in this app to make it complete, what is it?"
Or should i still be quite specific with defining success in a clean metric based way.