zekrioca

They probably meant that AI = fossil fuels, because gas is the energy source from where majority of electricity for AI datacenters will (proportionally) come from.

This isn’t a law.

The person simplified the paper with such a misunderstanding that I thought 10x before rebutting. They clearly didn’t read anything of the paper. Thanks for the clarification.

Some people don’t want to recognize the important work that went into this.

You paper "A catalog of stream processing optimizations" is great! It seems like a classic in stream processing for me :)

Generally I agree with this comment. Very few niche applications require stream processing and all struggle that had been into research to enable some of the ACID properties for stream processing.

While at it, would you know how kdb+ (mostly used in finance) work? It -- together with q -- seems to achieve very low latency for real time systems.

That, and even better when coupled with good public transportation.

Let it burn then?

They also run Chinese models for their china-based iPhones. So they would benefit from models being open.

And what would you say, Sherlock?