Recent submissions

Comment · 1 month ago
Well, the investment dollars are spent on the customers for the most part, though also on salaries and equipment. But the lions share of the value is going to the shareholders (eg employees and investors)... and they have liquidated and will continue to liquidate a disproportionate value to what they have spent on us. By some estimations at least. It's very possible $1 into this machine to feed your queries is worth $10+ to a shareholder based on whatever new valuation they get. So I'd say there is a hierarchy of enrichment.
Comment · 2 years ago
wow this looks really cool -- I like that it doesn't lock you into a specific keyboard / manufacturer
Comment · 2 years ago
Wow this is very cool. Would love to see some of the ideas in the video demo’d
Comment · 3 years ago
I wasn't trying to be hyperbolic, I've only been delayed by a side show once in my neighborhood by the Chase center -- I've never been blocked by a self driving car. I'm sure everyone has different experiences, but the characterization the article tries to make that these vehicles are a menace to society strike me as overblown and contradictory to many people's lived experiences here. At least these folks are paying money to treat the city like a playground. I haven't seen anyone get love tapped by one of the self-driving cars, but if that's happening regularly it seems like a pretty serious problem.
Comment · 3 years ago
I've been held up longer by side shows at intersections than driverless cars here. Not that SF is the lawless hellscape the media pretends is the case, but I do think it's a bit rich that city officials are pointing fingers at fairly remarkable services using paid permits that work well 99% of the time while failing to enforce laws that are broken more frequently.
Comment · 3 years ago
Wow this seems really useful! Is it bad the first thing I think when I see this is how a nefarious government can use it with bad intentions?
Comment · 4 years ago
Pretty cool stuff -- I am not a Google/Waymo employee, but it's amazing to see how this technology is progressing.
Comment · 4 years ago
Using "that doesn't work for me" as a euphemism for "no" sounds crazy to me.
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
I feel like the fact this person, per the article, is a white supremacist who used the n-word in his code repeatedly is under-discussed here. Folks here jumping through hoops to rationalize why what he did is actually demonstrative of either flaws in crypto or the purity of arbitrage come off seeming very tone deaf.
Comment · 4 years ago
I'm definitely too dumb to understand this, but it was an interesting read.
Comment · 4 years ago
Regarding the second LAN port and proprietary cable — standard RJ45 ports are not waterproof, especially if they’re delivering almost 100W (the max load of this new dishy). I expect that plays into the decision making here; also, selling a phase array antenna plus power supply plus WiFi router for $500 is actually pretty cheap.
Comment · 4 years ago
I'm legitimately bummed that the ability to control all my speaker volumes at once is a patented technology that I now no longer have access to.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton