yourcelf
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
"Philosophy of Technology" in general is a pretty rich field with a long history, and you might find more references in it than in engineering specifically.
MY_VAR="foo"
Docker does not do any quote parsing. For this same env file, it will set the value of the variable to `"foo"` (retaining the doublequotes in the value).Bash, of course, requires quotes if the variable contains any special bash characters (for example, literal JSON with curly brackets), but its quote handling is much more complex. django-environ doesn't interpret bash code; it just does simple quote chomping.
There's no reliable .env syntax you can use that works in all 3 of django-environ, Docker, and bash; and any variable that should start and end with quotes that are not stripped off can't be expressed in a way that both Docker and django-environ will read in the same way.
This may seem like a nit-picking edge case, but it's indicative of the design philosophy in django-environ of trying to be "helpful", but in ways which lead to subtle confusion. The way it guesses the path to your `.env` file is another example.
[1] https://github.com/joke2k/django-environ/blob/main/environ/e...
The biggest knock against django-environ is that it does not treat the `.env` syntax the same as Docker or bash -- meaning that the same environment file can't be reliably used to provide variables for both the container and Django.
django-classy-settings has been a joy to use, and its code is really simple and readable (~150 lines).
An off-kilter, hilarious, inventive, and cutting apocalyptic sci fi novel about pop music. Writing style is like Douglas Adams meets Tom Robbins, through the lens of Top 40 radio and tabloids.
This means that if your business model involves "try before you buy" or usage-based billing, you'd better be sure to make an initial charge, otherwise the customer might incur costs before Radar decides to block the charges.
Even if you do require an initial charge, if you allow customers to change their credit card between recurring charges, the new card could be extra risky and "fly under the Radar" until the first charge attempt.
Are there any plans to offer fraud risk and blocking when attaching a card to a customer, or will still be limited to just blocking charges? With Stripe's new emphasis on recurring billing, it seems like this would be important.
We currently see Radar as a liability for us. It might block the occasional fraud and avoid a chargeback, but it also allows customers to incur costs with dodgy cards before we know they're dodgy, and then blocks charges outright before we know.
This isn't to excuse the white-washy-ness of the video (e.g. lots of cowboys, no Indians), but just to say that the problem is at least a couple of levels out from just this video.
Here is an older post where the authors of the protocol explain why not OTR: https://whispersystems.org/blog/advanced-ratcheting/
The main takeaway: text messaging, unlike traditional instant messaging, is primarily asynchronous with long-lived sessions, where traditional instant messaging is primarily synchronous with short-lived sessions.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11454870-plotto
http://www.npr.org/2012/02/19/146941343/plotto-an-algebra-bo...
- the MBTA "hackers", 2008: http://www.openmediaboston.org/content/mbta-suit-against-mit...
- Star Simpson, 2007: http://www.boston.com/news/globe/city_region/breaking_news/2...
- Ryan McKinley's "Government Information Awareness", 2003: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Information_Awarene...
- Andrew "Bunnie" Huang, 2002, XBox hacker: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Huang
- Ladyada, 2002: http://www.ladyada.net/pub/research.html
- David LaMacchia, 1994: http://cd.textfiles.com/group42/WAREZ/LAMACCHI.HTM
And these are only a few cases that made headlines; there are many additional controversies handled more quietly. The point remains that the MIT General Counsel's office exists to protect the institute, not the students, even while MIT's culture rewards innovative, boundary-pushing work.
The point at issue here is that MIT needs a legal support structure for such students commensurate with its encouragement of the work.