yehoshuapw

yes, but I may have not used openscad enough.. (I use mostly build123d and some freecad, barely used openscad)

many other code-cad tools exist now too, my personal favorite is buld123d - python (and cadquery)

"Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!"

would you install such a app (without compiling from source)? I would not trust it to not come with "friends"

(but would love to verify and use)

that is true, but if the metric is what we want optimized, then that's fine.

However it is more likely to be something which can be detached..

Shoplifty

extra reviews never hurt. But trusting only the AI to both code and review security-wise? not even close to usable

mostly, because setting up a separate network is harder.

a virtual network built upon the regular internet is much easier.

And yes, mostly done wrong

I don't know. I fully agree, and never did really try out this in depth yet.

I suspect rules with negations are not the same as don't rules, but unknown if really true, if so:

"when writing code do not add comments, code should not need it" may work

I've come recently across arxiv 2604.20911

which claims "do" rules persist much better then "don't" rules.

I find it fascinating how (in the new version) the further away clumps stay separate, until something small from the larger swarm reaches them, then they all merge back to it

while I do agree with this point, I want to point out that this isn't quite a fair comparison.

every single entity has (normally) a single (real) burial site. Us grouping many unknowns in one group, and comparing to a single specific one is not quite fair...

there is only one burial site of many other fictional characters including some other well known and beloved ones.