yanofsky

oops sorry!

From the piece:

"We went to all this trouble because there is perennial fascination with the flying habits of the 2,800 Davos delegates. Use of private aircraft, though often wildly overstated, highlights the vast wealth and power that descends upon this small skiing town in the Swiss Alps each year. And their transportation choices are frequently criticized for their environmental impact at a conference that seeks solutions to reducing carbon emissions, among other topics."

I find it interesting because it is the only data that exist that can quantify and contextualize the anecdotal reports of the volume and impact of helicopter use at Davos.

While clearly some of you folks don't find it interesting, we found:

- The approximate volume of helicopter traffic that fly into and out of Davos, which was previously unknown

- The approximate number of helicopters that fly into and out of Davos, which was previously unknown

- The exact types of helicopters that were flying around Davos, which was previously unknown

This data also provide a benchmark for future analysis of and reporting on helicopter use patterns at Davos and elsewhere.

A flaw we admitted...in both years

Of course once you’ve made enough money it would be impossible to put it all into one stock without drastically affecting the stock’s price. Before long, you’d find that there were not enough shares to buy, or that you had purchased an entire company—a situation that we ignored for our analysis.

Couldn't have said it better myself

oops, my bad. apologies everyone