yanis_t

Joined 12 years ago

Karma
975
Submissions
652
Member since
May 11
Developing mt - a knowledge graph meets spaced repetition https://github.com/odosui/mt
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 month ago
Comment · 1 month ago
Would be very glad if anyone explained to me if and why this is revolutionary.
Comment · 1 month ago
I was just recently thinking about how we have built a lot of abstractions that makes it easier for a human to do useful stuff but they usually come with their own set of trade-offs.

And now in the LLM era, there's is less and less justification for using those very high level abstractions, and we'll see many of them die out in the upcoming years. React (native or not) is not exception.

Comment · 2 months ago
Vibe ROI-ing
Comment · 2 months ago
Is that he model that supposed to be Pro, but then they changed their mind?
Comment · 2 months ago
As others mentioned retyping is not fun. My approach is to let it write the code, but only in small portion. Not "implement this feature". But "open this file and make these changes". Each small change is easily reviewable and often times I end up asking it about better options and iterate a bit. Still feels like I'm in charge. Still feels like I'm learning stuff.
Comment · 3 months ago
The benchmarks are not particularly impressive. I suppose they needed to release something since the long pause. But not clear why would I use it now.
Comment · 4 months ago
Comment · 4 months ago
Two problems: I will not get my pleasure, and I will still not know how the code works.
Comment · 4 months ago
Are you implying using their brains?
Comment · 4 months ago
I keep thinking about at which point I should not force myself into the loop. As a developer I really like working on the code structure, making it clearer, thinking about good abstraction, breaking into modules, etc. I really take pleasure in it. At the same time I understand that at some point I am becoming the limiting factor.

If the point of the software is benefit people, should I still care about how the code looks.

Right now, I still think that the answer is yes, but in 3 years? in 10 years?

Comment · 4 months ago
I can only applaud. Regardless of whether this device is possible, or economically viable, this is a brave move and a bold vision. Taking bigger risks is what what makes the advances possible.
Comment · 4 months ago
Exactly. It was looking as though Apple understood this. But now they gave in and called it Siri AI.
Comment · 4 months ago
Exactly this. You can't have a competitive industry while at the same time heavily redistributing wealth to the point where people don't have any incentives at all.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton