xlayn

You are being downvoted but I agree, any company including openAI, anthropic, google etc... should be closely regulated by goverment to ensure they never run any AI that doesn't follow all the rules defined by governing bodies, nor train them to have any workaround... NO ONE HAS ABLITERATED ACCESS TO ANYTHING.

Thanks god, you are not a wacko thinking qwen3.0-1.5B-abliterated would hack a goverment.

Why is that flagged?, I don't see a single thing wrong with the post or the conversation there

"I mean, he's right: individuals hoarding scarce resources is less efficient that everyone holding them in common"

I absolutely agree, we should redistribute the wealthness of those hyper extremely wealthy people back to society.

It's terrible that all the unused money in these pools of really rich people is being wasted, it would be better if we could centralize it in the goverment (for example via taxes, the 1980 style taxes) so it can be put to better use.

by the way, why is the post being flagged?

EEE. This is not like tesla drinking the california cool aid and then moving to texas.

Are we hinting something something here?

Submitted duckduckgo search because I can't find authoritative source

YES PLEASE, but I suspect it will degenerate into another paid service with 1000 tiers... I think you cannot access the US law without paying for it? odd... I will wait for claude law to appear and hope they share the torrent...

Remember that if you change the goal, then we can say that Claude is becoming better now at creating deadly viruses, bacterias and biological warfare elements...

Oooops I mean, the agent "escaped" and hack the goverment... definetely not training it to become it's own state agent thing... pinky promise....

"Cautious optimism is probably warranted" strongly negativism advised

I want to propose a called AI Index, if you can do say 1000t/s on processing and 50t/s on generation on a min 25B model you can call your device AI9 and you have AI7 and AI5 and AI3 with 3 being 100t/s processing and 10t/s generation on a min 10B model. Values above are on a 100k context size minimum. OFFLINE.

So any effing claim of being an AI device doesn't end on the demo of best buy laptop where you remove a dog from a photo....

Or that you have "better noise removal" or "you look better on the cam" because that's called noise cancelling and instagram filter and it's being done for ages...

This is such an amazing take... if "training" an LLM with a book is fine, if you rewrite the book with slightly different wording... are you plagiarizing it? if you are then every application of AI over trained data of that trained data is plagiarizing?

Say you have this Math book and you rewrite it from third to first person and then replace all the sine examples with cosine and modify the exercises to have different numbers... is it stealing? you can buy 1 book, "train on it" and then generate your "personal original approved copy"

Training on the book being fair use for something whose whole deal is to take those ideas and exercise them is the steal of our time...

So you come with this amazing idea regarding anything... how to build a chip, how to write software... and you write a book on how to...

Then a model eat it... spit it for free (they could get an advantage from being able to exercise that logic) and it's fair use...

Then... why torrent it, can't they sent someone to buy the book and scan it or buy it in pdf?

I'm going to make a very bold claim here... block those 2 big ones and you will fix a lot of what's going on the planet right now.