xcavier

Guy whose business model is predicated on hoovering up everyone's personal data so he can sell advertising (and similar targeting services) now wants to give everyone a "fatter" pipe for hoovering even more (and different types of) data...

When linking my Google Mail, Composio was asking for some concerning data (DOB, exact street address). I noped out of that

Can't we get proper noise cancellation first before they worry about gesture control…

I'm sure this would be interesting if it actually rendered on my device…

I agree. He did not misspeak. He said exactly what he believes, and he's now being called out for it.

Is this where we request commentators to ‘out’ themselves as Australian citizens/residents (or not) before they respond (born Brisvegas 1970 here)

Chances this is a shonky attempt to drag new training data from private users?

In addition to the environmental issues, surely a wide disparity in dialects and speech patterns must have played a role? ML/NLP models largely be trained on clear, precise - and predictable - English language must struggle when you add in an accent, slang usage and age/geo-specific language choice?

Just the other day I was wishing there was a uBlock but for podcasts...

Also... McDonalds isn't in the business of selling food. It is in the business of owning real estate and selling "inputs" to its franchise holders. It makes money by selling equipment and food inputs to franchisors. It can't grow revenues if it doesn't find new things to sell to franchisees.

I think the biggest issue with the decentralised crowd is they think their target market is their (technical) peers. Web publishing was a cul de sac until it went WYSIWYG. Dialup internet didn’t take off until the likes of AOL dumbed it down.

Until the decentralisation experience becomes AOL simple, it will remain a backwater.

I think the key language here is pause "commercial use". They're not asking for a pause on R&D - just not making the tech/products available to the market (to quote: "temporarily pause commercial use"), until such time as agreed guardrails can be applied. This is a much more pragmatic solution than the "open letter" calling a halt on R&D.

I've seen an increase in strangers messaging me on WhatsApp. When I ask them how we know each other, they tell me a friend passed on my details and said I was a good person to know, they're new to the city etc. If I press on the details, they eventually say something along the lines of "Oh, I mistyped the number I was given - I was meant to text someone else" (in some scenarios they go straight to this line when I ask how we know each other). Invariably they then say "you sound like a nice person, let's chat". Classic scam setup.

I read that headline as precisely the opposite: oh, bugger, they are not doing well and that money won’t help