wybo
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
The AgentBase library actually was a fork from the AgentScript library. See here for why I forked it (basically to keep it simple and to be able to apply basic minimum coding standards and add automated tests): https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/agentbase/4NicEY8B6W...
Happy tinkering!
Do save your model as a new one if you want, makes it a one-click experience for visitors.
(in an ideal scenario AgentBase would do this automatically, and for each edit provide a link to that version... gists don't fork, sadly)
You can try a template model here: http://agentbase.org/model.html?9d54597f7aafc995d227
AgentBase uses:
* HTML canvas, jQuery, etc
* CoffeeScript browser library, for compilation of CoffeeScript
* ACE editor for code editing
* GitHub gists, mini-repositories for storage of models
* NodeJS + Mongo for keeping a list of models
Comments most welcome!
As for solving traffic problems, they don't necessarily do this more so than public transport would, if Googlers took that.
I think the issue is more that MUNI might have to think about introducing first-class busses, or first-class sections, or something like that. Because many people don't like sharing a bus bench with smelly (homeless) people.
Private public transport can out compete public transport. But then school buses already do this as well (compared to Europe). Though I did commute using SF buses, and I fully understand why one would not prefer ones kids to travel on them, and even why one would prefer company buses.
As for rents, true, but can that not mostly be blamed on restrictive building regulations? Not so much with regards to standards as well with regards to limits to flats and highrise buildings. As there is an undisputed market demand for more housing in the bay-area.
Imho protesters are a tad misguided in who they are targeting.
Ethical? That's the question.
1) In the far future, when most direct hardships are a thing of the past our lives probably resemble those of Harvard students more, than those of a random population sample in the 1930's
2) It is relatively easy to think of things that may make poor, disadvantaged, discriminated against, etc. people unhappy. And there is some data on this. While it was/is less clear for the advantaged.
3) Mentioned elsewhere, a study can gain discerning power if variables that vary a lot are kept constant. Similarly to how when doing a scientific experiment, one wants to control most variables besides the one one wants to test (simply makes the study more narrow, but deeper).
4) Practically speaking, a lot of psychological research is done on students, simply because they are within easy reach for scholars. Why Harvard students? Because that's a place where they would embark on something long-term like this 70 years ago.
5) More cynically, the scholars behind the study, and even after 70 years still the most powerful social demographic group, and probably a large portion of the most well-read, are in the sample they picked. So they sort of wanted to scratch their own itch first...
Finally, see the lovely series 7UP for a more random sample (allbeit much smaller, and British...)
Exactly the way it should be for a hardware product like this.
So far I think the best in the series was Supreme Commander: Forged Alliance (not Supreme Commander II).
I backed & am greatly looking forward to Planetary Annihilation (though not too excited about the cartoony art-work). Just made a donation to 0AD too.
Allows 'the market' for good education to operate, without bringing money into the equation.
Montessori, or Jenaplan (a Dutch/German thing, which was the one I went to).
There was a bit of 'prison' in that there was a certain number of fixed tasks to complete each week in areas such as Math, Dutch and English. But one could pick which, and mostly even check them oneself. Once done, the rest of the time was free to work on projects and things just like you described above (the carrot :-). Often by Wednesday afternoon I was done.
It thus worked wonderfully for me, though it may not be for everyone. But when I have kids they are definitely going to a Jenaplan-type school. As it never felt like a prison to me and instilled a love of learning, and ability to plan and reward myself (besides other positive things such as a sense of equality towards others, including bosses & profs)
School != School. Shop around before you reinvent.
And not about the current situation (+ the macho 'my hours are longer than yours' trap that most of the California Software world seems to be in...) that drains much of the possibility of having a life besides work.
One idea that crossed my mind when I still worked in the Vallley, was that the situation might be reversed by a 'Union' that only concerns itself with working hours. Leaving salaries up to everyone for themselves to negotiate as currently.
This would:
1) Allow people a coming-out in terms of favoring work-life balance. Which many people confessed to me in private, but did not dare say in front of their boss/team (has nothing to do with a lack of love for the job/project/company, even love itself you can't enjoy 10 hours a day 50 weeks a year, or that would be the length of billionaires honey-moons. Also what is wrong with loving your life and family/friends in addition to the job, and needing some time for that?).
2) Create a bargaining position and a public face for it.
3) Dispel myths of long-term productivity gains through longer hours. Especially in a creative industry like Software Engineering long hours reduce productivity (there are studies of this + the many self-evaluations on HN over the years of people being able to code consistently and productively 4 to 7 hours per day max).
Just an idea that crossed a mind.
PhD Student Social Science of the Internet at Oxford (topic attainment of Critical Mass)
Homepage: http://wybowiersma.net