wizardofdos
Joined 5 years ago
Joined 5 years ago
4) co2 balance of those 'biofuels' is way worse than fuels refined from extracted fossil fuels
5) additional supply of these fuels lowers fuel prices thereby slowing shift to renewable energy sources (i.e. renewable electricity)
6) simply paying farmers for fallow fields is a much simpler solution to the problem
Possibly there is also not the political will to ramp up the regulatory speed and power although I still have hope that Biden will be able to change that at least a bit.
Why is the constant screaming at me? Why is the fact that it's a constant important enough to be encoded in the styling of the letters, but not important enough to be encoded in the name. Why isn't the IDE or the compiler keeping track of the constantness of the variable and reminding me to not do the wrong thing? If they can and are, why am I not trusting them? And if they can't, why am I writing in a language that doesn't even have JavaScript levels of a type system?
Or in absolute numbers, the top 10% emitted 3x the amount of the whole bottom 50%.
And that is without taking historic emmisions into consideration.
What we don't have time for is doing nothing (ie continuing the destruction of our habitat). The 1.5° C goal is already getting out of reach.
As in impossible to influence via regulation. Once you realize that proper regulation is a good thing and a must in a functioning society, you realize something that can not be regulated can't be allowed to exist as it will undermine said society.
You will need a maths degree for actually telling.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_violence_against_LG...
Considering the rest of your comment picturing Ukraine as some backwater (post)soviet hell hole: You've never been there. You've never even talked to someone from there.