willmarch

Your last sentence: "That is something that AI can never do on its own."

Never say never...

You didn't really answered my question. Why is it important to you to know that there is a human on the other side of things? You just restated what your preference is without giving the 'why' of the preference, which is what I'm curious about.

"Haiti is extremely dangerous due to rampant crime, including kidnappings and gang violence, particularly in areas like Port-au-Prince. The U.S. State Department advises against all travel to Haiti because of these severe security risks."

I have friends from Haiti that are currently on the TPS program and hear directly from them about conditions, so your attempts at naivety and ludicrous accusations are not welcome in a serious discussion.

Are you suggesting we should move people from safe conditions to unsafe conditions simply because you don't like the length of time they have been in safe conditions?

For me personally, the conditions should be as safe or safer than the current conditions under which a person resides before considering removal of protective status, or else it would be cruel and inhumane to move them (to worse conditions).

I think preventing unnecessary human suffering should be the number one concern, do you not?

I don't think length of time is the rational indicator of whether or not the status is still necessary, the present conditions within the country would be the rational indicator, yes?

There is no problem if it is done for rational reasons and in a fair/unbiased way, but if it is done for irrational reasons (xenophobia, racisms, bigotry, etc) and in unfair/biased way then that is a major problem; the motivations and methods matter.

Why?

Why?

Why should people give up their right to free expression and being secure in their papers simply because you have voluntarily given up that right in advance?