Recent submissions

Comment · 14 days ago
I agree but I think both things can be true . Like in this case.
Comment · 14 days ago
Sounds like great weapon to assassinate someone.

Jokes apart, can anyone well versed actually tell of this is just a paper for publishing sake or is there any truth to this story ?

Comment · 14 days ago
> ' a man driving them home and knowing their home address while right there is a much more immediate and specific point of threat than '

Its not anymore of a threat than the taxi itself in case of Waymo. If you have already designated the driver as the threat actor then the Waymo is just as much a threat. In case of the driver the threat is visible. In a robotaxi the threat actor is invisible and multiple. You can be remotely locked in, driven away, suffocated, driven into water , driven in middle of a shooting.

You are just trading a visible threat with an invisible one.

Comment · 14 days ago
Humans vs clankers it is then then! lets see who wins.
Comment · 15 days ago
Surveilling on women without their knowledge and then using that footage as you like is dangerous too. Tech companies are famous for their ethics. Letting women get into a cab controlled by an overseas driver seems dangerous too.

Lets not hide profits behind women's safety.

Comment · 15 days ago
Spoken like a true Waymo lobbyist.

IMO legislating for them is legislating against humans , their jobs, their families .

Comment · 15 days ago
Cost of driver replaced with cost of what ? how do you sustain that cost and dose it cost more than the driver ? One liner sounds cool but please back it up with something.
Comment · 15 days ago
Where are you getting this number? Imagination is free but to execute the imagination is not. So yes, it depends on the imagination of the person who owns the tech AI company not your imagination.

And what is the cost of replacing the driver with the hardware/software and the servicing cost. and the operators in Philippines that are remotely working ?

Comment · 15 days ago
Do you know any minors that had the police called on them mid ride by a RoboTaxi company becuase the taxi AI though the minor had guns. Yeah Waymo did that.

For your Women's safety POV. just because now youre alone in the car doesn’t really mean you are alone. You are under constant remote surveillance.

Regarding the meter broke issue. So you'd rather have corporate price fixing. Because that’s what Waymo is doing. The fleet size is same but the costs are going up.

And when a giant tech company is a service provided and rule maker , you don't really have a choice left.

Comment · 15 days ago

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton