wch

Joined 15 years ago

Karma
176
Submissions
41
Member since
Jan 8
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/winston; my proof: https://keybase.io/winston/sigs/4KAki9JLvQ9Rw0mjQZvz0yJB1DCKf0gGX-khcr5ulJY ]
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
When I run `npm audit`, it points me to a security advisory at GitHub. For example, for debug, it is https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8mgj-vmr8-frr6 .

That page says that the affected versions are ">=0". Does that seem right? That page also says:

> Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it.

Is this information accurate?

Comment · 1 year ago
I agree 100% with you. The author starts the essay with the very technique that he uses later on the essay: frame the conversation in his terms (that LLMs are _not_ inevitable), and then once that's done, anyone who disagrees can be dismissed.

The irony is that he's doing it, just in the opposite direction of those he disagrees with.

Some things _are_ economically inevitable, and it's wishful thinking to ignore them. For example, it is inevitable that solar will be the primary form of electricity generation in the coming decades (and I am thankful that this is the case). For those that were watching closely, this was clear several years ago, and it is even more clear today.

People whose fortunes are built on the fossil fuel industry might wish it were otherwise, and they might dismiss "solar inevitabilists" with the same technique as the author. But those people would be wrong.

If someone says that something is inevitable, they could be wrong. But they could also be right.

Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
This reads like it was written by AI.
Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
That looks fantastic. It also looks like you also have Pyright running in the browser. Is that right? I thought Pyright only supported running on NodeJS.
Comment · 4 years ago
Did the original Wordle have a free license? I don't recall seeing license information anywhere.
Comment · 4 years ago
I just want to say that I really enjoyed reading this article. It's among the clearest, most accessible writing about a technical subject that I've encountered in a while.
Comment · 6 years ago
On human scales, the time dimension is much "bigger" than the space dimensions...

This is really interesting, and it made me wonder how to convert between space and time. I mean, one meter up is equivalent in magnitude to one meter forward, is equivalent to one meter to the right. Is _c_ the conversion between space and time? In other words, is 300 million meters equivalent in magnitude to one second of time?

Comment · 9 years ago
Another serious question: if a stock has no voting rights and no dividends, why would it be worth anything at all? That is, what makes it different from a piece of paper with the company's name on it? If there are voting rights, then there's value because someone potentially could buy enough shares to meaningfully exert those rights, but if not, then what value do the shares have to anyone?
Comment · 10 years ago
From my quick skim of the article, I think this is the key part:

> These results imply that, after correcting for confounding variables (see notes under Table 3), those who were deficient at time of birth had on average 0.06 point higher gender-weighted SRS score, which corresponds to an increase of approximately one fourth of the s.d. (s.d. of the SRS in the total sample=0.23). When treating SRS as a dichotomous outcome, that is, comparing children with SRS scores above the suggested cutoff with children below the suggested cutoff, those who were vitamin D deficient at mid-gestation were 3.8 times more likely to be screened positive than those who were vitamin D sufficient at mid-gestation (see also Supplementary Table 4).

(SRS is the Social Responsiveness Scale)

Comment · 11 years ago
There are people who waste money on toys, eating out, clothes and all that -- but those expenses pale in comparison to the really big costs:

- Child care (necessary if both parents work or there's just one parent)

- Larger apartment/house, in an area with good schools

My wife and I live in a large midwestern city. Prior to having kids, we had more than enough space in a 2-bedroom apartment. We had in the past (as students) lived comfortably on less than $20k each a year.

Putting an infant in a day care costs between $1200 and $1600 here. It drops a few hundred when the baby moves into the toddler room, and a few hundred more when the toddler moves into the older kids' room. With two kids in day care (an infant and an older kid), that still costs in the ballpark of $2000-2500 per month.

The 2-bedroom apartment is too small for 2 adults plus 2 children, plus visiting family members who help with kids, and moving to a bigger place in an area with good schools also increases monthly costs substantially.

Even if you're not spending money frivolously, having kids is expensive compared to not having them.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton