waynecolvin
Joined 16 years ago
Karma
142
Submissions
56
Member since
Oct 27
Newbie poking around. Hello.
View on Hacker NewsRecent submissions
Comment · 9 years ago
If they misrepresent their arguements there must be a motive.
Comment · 9 years ago
I believe ktRolster may be refering to "Procedural Abstration". The term is used in SICP [1] (the Wizard Book using scheme, previously freshman programming text at MIT).
Abstration can take many forms. But can often be described as "seperating things that change and/or repeat from those that don't", or something like that.
The last paragraph may be a joke, or based on one of the Principles in the O'Reilly Design Patterns [2] book.
[1] https://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/ [2] http://shop.oreilly.com/product/mobile/9780596007126.do
Comment · 9 years ago
I believe Linus claims to be an engineer, or maybe a manager nowadays. shrug Glad he has done well anyways.
Comment · 9 years ago
Trust is earned, Linus is right.
Comment · 9 years ago
Traditionally big corporations, or anybody with legacy systems, are very conservative with technology choices...
Comment · 9 years ago
You might be complaining about students being taught Python and it becoming their "blub" language. We all start somewhere, and you can indeed go far with Python in some fields. It's popular with scientists for instance.
Recommended reading: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9nipa/joel_on_... ( https://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2009/09/23.html )
http://www.paulgraham.com/avg.html
http://www.lessonsoffailure.com/tag/paul-graham/ <-- note "flamewar" in the title!
Comment · 9 years ago
I don't like Python either but it's out there and a fact of life. You use whatever a client requires.
Dictionaries, sets and lists can be nice though.
Go here( https://www.thecodingforums.com/threads/performance-sets-vs-... ) and search-find "Terry Reedy".
Comment · 9 years ago
It can be a terrible filter, but credentialism fits in well with bureaucratic environments. :/
Comment · 9 years ago
True. But before the days of Structured Programming widespread understanding of algorithms was hoped to lead to a professional Software Engineering field.
The idea of "Software Engineering" was born with the Software Crisis report in the 1960's.
Later on practicing SE's would study things like Design Patterns so things evolved over time.
EDIT: Software Engineers probably should know some relevant basics, but programmers could never come up with a "body of knowledge" like real engineers have.
It all depends what you work on and what new developments keep coming out...
Comment · 9 years ago
I think the priority was to reenable discussion of new movies and TV shows, that would be useful moving forward. But maybe they could make an API.
Comment · 9 years ago
Wait a moment, they have a Falsehoods series on all sorts of subjects. The Fake News fact checkers are going to try globbing on to every niche they can...
Comment · 9 years ago
A real man might take responsibility, but if that ever becomes too visible you will be made the dunce if not scapegoat. Maybe only the successful people had the clout to pull it off. :/
Admitting mistakes to move on, failing fast, should prevent prolonging arguements though (if you can pull it off).
Comment · 9 years ago
Languages/libraries evolve and bitrot is a fact of life, yes.
Now you have me thinking about how to plan that long! You would need an architecture easy to port and good documentation...
Or become so important that old platforms are maintained for your sake!
Comment · 9 years ago
I was actually thinking about veterins returning to civillian life at the time, but maybe you're right.