wawawiwa

(OP) same here :'(

(OP) That's what on the Reddit post indeed, but unfortunately this option isn't available everywhere, and it doesn't always work :/

I agree with the author about the definition he gives to "long".

I think it's subjective anyway. Notre-Dame or the Sagrada Familia were / are being built in more than a hundred years, so the dozen of years of Apollo could be qualified as short in comparison.

When reading "long", it can only be subjective so there is no point of arguing.

My take: He can claim he is proud because he acknowledges their work and - as the rest of the work - it influences promotion and raises. He enjoys and rewards the positive impact this work has for the company image and the skills of the employees.

Why does this post have so many points? How is that article useful to most readers? I sometimes don't understand HN.

Performance matters... the article talks about a case that most of us aren't confronted with.

Beside, it concludes that in spite of paper being slower, it's still prefered, so how does that prove that "performance matters"?!

Should an article be upvoted just because an article is about life and death and has a catchy (pretentiously) laconic title?