vysakh0

This has become all too common with lastpass. I migrated out during their last incident. I wonder how does it keep happening and how do customers still continue.

This resonates a lot. The shift from "was I right?" to "does this actually help people?" changes everything. I've found that the engineers who got promoted fastest weren't always the smartest problem solvers, they were the ones who genuinely cared about the end outcome.

The hardest part is that user focus is sometimes at odds with technical cleanliness. You can ship something inelegant but useful, or elegant but slightly off from what people need. Most orgs mess this up by choosing elegance.

Duckdb is an excellent OLAP db, I have had customers who had s3 data lake of parquet and use databricks or other expensive tool, when they could easily use duckdb.. Given we have cursor/claude code, it is not that hard for lot of use cases, I think the lack of documentation on how duckdb functions -- in terms of how it loads these files etc are some of the reasons companies are not even trying to adopt duckdb. I think blogs like this is a great testament for duckdb's performance!

I'm ready to feed the context again if it gets better result. Is this convenience comes at a cost of better result?

In 2025, many SaaS companies are racing to define their AI strategy. While there are plenty of grand visions of fully autonomous “agentic” products, there’s also a more immediate, practical solution that’s surprisingly powerful: a chatbot-driven user experience.

At Databrain, we’re building a modern business intelligence platform. Anyone who’s ever used tools like Tableau or Power BI knows how complex these systems can become—so much so that companies offer certifications just to confirm you know where to click to accomplish certain tasks.

And it’s not just BI. Many SaaS products are brimming with features that users often struggle to discover. Customers scour documentation or call support just to learn how to perform a seemingly straightforward action. Why should users be forced to memorize new menus and workflows? Why invest so much cognitive effort into navigating a product?

Enter the chatbot-driven UX: Rather than forcing users to master every nook and cranny of your interface, a chat-based system lets them simply tell the AI what they want. The AI can guide them to the correct page, perform the requested action, and allow the user to verify or tweak the outcome in real time. It’s a natural stepping stone on the road to “agentic” interfaces, where the AI does most of the heavy lifting but still leaves room for human oversight.

I recently built a prototype to illustrate this concept. At Databrain, we plan to launch this feature soon as part of our platform’s evolution. We previously tested an “AI data assistant,” but it didn’t fully catch on—mainly because people want to trust the output, and they get concerned when it isn’t 100% accurate. Now, I’m convinced a “co-pilot” approach, where humans remain in control while AI assists in routine tasks, is the right balance. This chatbot-driven UX is our first step in that direction.

Ultimately, the idea is to minimize the user’s cognitive burden and accelerate the path to actionable insights. We’ll share more about our progress at Databrain in the coming days, but I’m excited to see how this approach changes the way people interact with complex SaaS products.

Looks interesting! Even without voice, it would feel great. Btw, I couldn't do any other actions like scroll or click on other links, it would be nice if there is a way to get back to the demo when needed.

It doesn't return the data as pandas dataframes, I think pandas ai would be a better if you're looking into something more specific to pandas and chat with db.

This is interesting! So it autocompletes based on the DB schema and improves a DB admin's workflow?