vmihailenco
Joined 5 years ago
Joined 5 years ago
In v1.4 release Uptrace got built-in alerting capabilities that allow to monitor metrics, manage alerts, and receive notifications without using AlertManager. But AlertManager is still supported.
While OpenTelemetry remains to be the main source of telemetry data, Uptrace also provides integrations for Prometheus metrics, Vector logs, FluentBit, Sentry, and CloudWatch.
You can quickly try Uptrace by:
- Running a Docker example: https://github.com/uptrace/uptrace/tree/master/example/docke...
- Checking Uptrace Cloud demo: https://app.uptrace.dev/play
If you have any feedback or questions, let me know in the comments!
But I find CPU profiling a lot less useful, because production profiles tend to be too broad and it is hard to make sense from them, for example, Uptrace profile mostly consists of memory allocations and network calls.
So I would not say that CPU profiling is superior/better/can replace tracing.
I guess ElasticSearch is still relevant when it comes to searching text, but ClickHouse is much faster when it comes to filtering and analyzing the data.
Give ClickHouse a try and you won't be disappointed.
>Whether I can find out why that component is slow might not be as easy (not sure what granularity tracing happens inside a component).
It is true that you can't always guess what operation going to be slow and instrument it, but it is almost always a network or a database call. There is still no way to tell *why* it is slow, but the more data you have the more hints you get.
>What's the usual overhead of a single tracing
Depending on what is your base comparison point the answer can be very different.
Usually, you trace or instrument network/filesystem/database calls and in those cases the overhead is negligible (few percents at most).
>But does that mean taking a trace is very cheap?
What you've described is tail-based sampling and it only helps with reducing storage requirements. It does not reduce the sampling overhead. Check https://uptrace.dev/opentelemetry/sampling.html
But is taking a trace cheap? Definitely. Billions of traces? Not so.
>request sampling decision something that's common or that's a totally unique capability some have.
It is a common practice to reduce cost of sampling when you have billions of traces, but it is an advanced feature because it requires backends to buffer incoming spans in memory so you can decide if the trace is anomalous or not.
Besides, you can't store only anomalous traces because you will lose a lot of useful details and you can't really detect anomaly without knowing what is the norm.
Hopefully that helps.
If there is another license that better reflects our intentions, let us know.
Uptrace uses the BSL license to forbid or rather not allow other companies creating a cloud service using Uptrace code, because that is how we are planning to monetize. But you can self-host Uptrace and use it as you want to monitor your (production) application. I think this is fair enough.
I am sure there are many complications with re-licensing, but it happens in practice, for example, Sentry now uses BSL license. And you can't do anything about it except to fork old Sentry. But then you will have to maintain it yourself.
And I am not arguing with anything you've said, but there are not that many financially thriving truly OSS projects. That's why people like me have to complicate their lives with BSL, AGPL, and others.
Thanks for the comment!
I can only repeat that the same BSL license is used by MariaDB, Sentry, CockroachDB, Couchbase, and others. I am not a lawyer and thus not qualified to discuss details.
It is true for all licenses, for example, it is possible to keep old code available under old permissive license but release all new code under a more restricted license.
None is safe! :)
This release focuses on performance and scalability:
- 5–10x faster queries using ClickHouse’s new JSON column type (nested fields can be queried directly with dot-notation, no ETL or flattening required)
- Multi-project support – manage projects, users, and orgs via UI or YAML seed files
- Real-time data transformations (rename, filter, enrich spans/logs, sample dynamically) using an [Expr-based](https://github.com/expr-lang/expr) scripting system
- Redesigned dashboards and query builder for faster incident response and exploration
- Handles massive traces (10k–1M spans) with tunable resource limits
It’s still open-source and free to self-host. We’ve published migration guides, Ansible and Kubernetes deploy instructions, and full [release details](https://uptrace.dev/blog/uptrace-v20.html).
Would love feedback from the HN crowd — especially from folks scaling ClickHouse or building custom observability pipelines.
Links:
- Blog & details: https://uptrace.dev/blog/uptrace-v20.html
- Install guide: https://uptrace.dev/get/hosted/install
- GitHub: https://github.com/uptrace/uptrace