vercadium

I must have missed your second point (or you edited it in). The maximum range for the P90 is 3700 in-game units (308ft) compared with 4000 units (333ft), so you cannot!

That said, very few places in any official CS map have ranges that long. One would be on Train from Terrorist spawn to "Ivy" @ 3900 units (325ft).

No worries; thanks! :)

The rounds fired value is limited by the number of bullets in the clip, so you can select up to 50 rounds (because the P90 is in the comparison) but the MP7 will run out of ammo at 30.

Thanks for using the site! :)

Thanks for taking the time to comment! I disagree with you on the history though. By the same token, a large portion of users would press 'back' to expect to return to a previous view, only to exit the site. If I land on a site from Google and click on 'About us', I expect to need to click twice to return. I think it's intuitive as-is.

For what it's worth, pure state changes (that don't occupy a page within the router) do use history.replaceState though.

I understand that this wouldn't be the case if I approached the design as per the rest of your feedback; placing a lot of this content within a single view could be done. However, the UI/UX is designed to be shallow, minimal and mobile friendly.

For example, while I could put weapon selection in as a filter and add controls to toggle between data views - creating a single powerful view - this doesn't actually accomplish much other than trading valuable space for increased UI complexity to avoid moving views.

Admittedly, I see this through a different lens as I'm aware of the amount of controls I need to somehow fit further down the line to support upcoming features. A desktop only site would be very different!

I appreciate your feedback; it's great to see things from another perspective.

I have updated the visuals for highlighting the "best" value as a result of your feedback; let me know how you feel about the change :)

I have updated the visuals for highlighting the "best" value as a result of your feedback; let me know how you feel about the change :)

Great idea! I had plans to add in a few examples for context, but showing that visually is something I hadn't considered yet; thanks for the feedback :)

Excellent points; thanks for the feedback. I responded to someone else in here with more details, but I'll be adjusting it for sure.

Thanks for the feedback; absolutely! Modelling these additional aspects like recoil and accuracy with customisable shot intervals is underway.

To elaborate, they didn't make it into the initial release as there's a substantial amount of work involved to tie that in dynamically with the data (as each shot is inherently dependant on all the shots before it and the time between them when firing multiple rounds).

I understand how much value this would add to the comparisons, so it's a top priority!

Global Offensive yeah. It's pretty much taken in both the 1.6 and Source communities at this point (though I'm sure both have some dedicated players remaining).

I actually modified what I posted elsewhere (Reddit for example) for this audience as I imagined those technical details were more relevant. Fair point though.

I understand what you mean about the charts; some prefer things displayed visually so I think it's important to meet the needs of different types of users.

Thanks for the feedback!

Thanks! Great point on the highlighting; it's a tough balance because I also want to make it look subtle (I'd be worried that an icon would be jarring when there is a sea of them during a comparison) but I'm sure something could be done to improve it. Hmm, perhaps colouring the "best" text with the my accent/success colour (the yellow) rather than, or in addition to, the weapon's name? Something to think about.