usbsea

Oh yeah --facepalm-- it's purple after all!

I get the impression the "random dude" is the expert you are already paying $100k/yr for. It sends them a slack message, email, etc. The sales pitch is you don't have to code that microservice so you can ship your AI a bit faster. Which is fair enough, since most SaaS is 99% other PaaS/SaaS + some core unique business factor thrown on top. However I worry about how much this company is charging. It is pricey.

Wordpress has comments built in

The last 10% being replacing all the words with ones that are useful to the reader.

Make that 6 iterations of such a site, one using wordpress, one using HTML and VIM and no tools, one using an SSG, one using k8s on 4 solar-powered rpis, one using a home-made CMS, and one written in Rust from scratch. Each one with a blog post "Why I...".

This is a bit like a gift card. Not the worst idea! I have been waiting 10 years to buy a coffee with crypto BTW.

A simple one too - it would be on a 216 colour pallete using six values for each of R, G and B.

R = 1/5

G = 2/5

B = 3/5

Edit: of course that makes sense it is probably a "web safe" one

In this shovel rush, even the shovel factory makers (OpenAI) are not sustainable, and the shovel factory factory makers (NVidia) are doing well. Ironically the "gold" is with all the boring companies on the consumer side of the AI.

You avoid a seed phrase, but how? I thought it was "not your keys not your coin".

My understanding is someone who wants secure crypto needs to cryptographically safely generate a seed phrase. For signigicant amounts of money you will want that backed up. I guess if this is like a $50 gift card people are treating it like that and might accept if it gets lost then shrug.

Yes sort of enough to be useful to use, and I do use it, but not complete enough to be perfect. A bit like Google tasks!

It does the main things though - it can check other calendars, people can book into your calendar, it deals with time zones and schedules.

It fits into the valley of "use if you are already using Google stuff alot, but not worth it as a solo feature if you don't".

Cal.com is way better. But then that is no suprise, it's their only job.

An earth mass black hole would surely peturb various orbits of planets in a solar system though?

This is obvious, as anoter commenter said, but this is nonetheless useful.

You can use it to show graduates. Why have them waste time relearning the same mistakes. You probably need a longer blog post with examples.

It is useful as a check list, so you can pause when working earlier in the lifecycle to consider these things.

I think there is power in explaining out the obvious. Sometimes experienced people miss it!

The diagram can be condensed by saying SMUR + F = 1. IN other words you can slide towards Fidelity, or towards "Nice Testibility" which covers the SMUR properties.

However it is more complex!

Let's say you have a unit test for a parser within your code. For a parser a unit test might have pretty much the same fidelity as an intergation test (running the parse from a unit test, rather than say doing a compilation from something like Replit online). But the unit test has all the other properties be the same in this instance.

Another point is you are not testing anything if you have zero e2e tests. You get a lot (a 99-1 not 80-20) by having some e2e tests, then soon the other type of tests almost always make sense. In addition e2e tests if well written and considers can also be run in production as synthetics.