tytho

I agree that we can’t compare older models to newer ones, but how much code was generated during those months/years when the models weren’t good at secure code? How much is still running publicly today? It’s still worth considering the impact to the overall ecosystem.

I worked with a guy who specialized in custom reporting tools and pipelines. He said that a majority of the time people are asking for custom reporting tools, it’s because the app’s built-in tools for sorting/filtering/aggregating data aren’t answering the questions they are asking.

Now whenever someone brings that up, I ask “What question are they wanting the answer to?”. It usually leads to either a new feature or just clarifying where that question can be answered. Looks like you’ve caught onto that same school of thought.

Sometimes people just want to feed data into their own warehouse so they can query data across different pieces of software, or they are too stubborn to get to the bottom of what question they’re trying to answer.

I was a heavy macOS Spaces user. Upon a recommendation to use Aerospace from somewhere else here a few months ago, I switched and love it. I considered Yabai, but some features required disabling SIP (System Integrity Protection).

Game development is often a completely different set of skills and maintenance profile compared to enterprise SaaS development. Many single-player games especially indie ones don’t need to worry about multi-year contracts or having to work through many cycles of different developers coming in and out of a project. Having a 1000+ line switch statement seems totally reasonable on a project with a handful of developers that will continue to work on the project.

My understanding is that the switch statement was for npc character conversation text. That seems pretty reasonable, even in enterprise SaaS for something like translations. It might not be as easy to maintain in other circumstances.

Many applications need a way to contact a user (security breach, password reset). If one only has a username and forgets the password, there’s no way to reverify the user.

Fly has a form of auto-scaling. You have to provision the max amount of machines then you configure them to auto-sleep. It's possible that the creator didn't anticipate this much traffic or didn't want to pre-pay for all those sleeping machines.

I can’t speak to the official decisions made by these camps/courses, but from my own experience as an undergrad, I was first introduce to MySQL, and the professors at my university did not teach using migration management tools for bringing a schema in a database up. You were either using a GUI to set up the tables, or running your own cobbled together sql files. For class assignments this was fine. Then I had a professor introduce mongo to me. I was floored by the idea of having my schema live along-side the application code! No more messing around in SQL GUIs! Then of course over time I realized you still need to maintain a schema over time and provide someway to “upgrade” data when your schema evolves, and keep your data consistent. Then I discovered the tools around migrating mongo data are not nearly as mature as the ones you’ll find for SQL databases.

I find mongo alright at producing a short-lived prototype of an application (e.g. school assignments), but the risk of it shipping to production for a long period is too risky for the “benefit”.

They can be, but they both offer PostgreSQL services. The article touches on Supabase’s other offerings, but the comparison is mostly on the database offerings.

The browser EventSource constructor does not have options to pass in your own headers. You can pass an option to have it use the cookies for the domain you’re using. There are libraries that allow you to pass in additional HTTP options, but they essentially reimplement the built-in EventSource object in order to do so. Not terribly difficult, fairly simple spec.

Ah, I titled that wrong. Fixed! Mostly authentication, but authorization is also a topic I’m studying a lot recently. I feel like there’s more resources on that than the questions I have about authentication. I’m currently diving into the Google Zanzibar papers.

You can still use `tsc` to validate the jsdoc types. It will spit out errors when types don’t match.

You can use `tsc` to export the types defined in jsdoc and other projects that import your module will get all the intellisense and type checking as if it had been written in TypeScript.

I won’t speak for others, but I for one can’t stand the amount of extra packages needed to get a TypeScript project working. I need to install adapters for my linter, formatter, test runner, editor, bundler to name a few. Hopefully it all works together with all the other plugins and adapters. With the jsdoc version, I just install the `typescript` package, and I can use that to do the typechecking as well export types to be used by a TypeScript project. Sure it’s a bit more verbose, but I’d take that over tinkering with dependencies and configurations.