twsted

True one year ago, not now

Very good analysis.

One thought: What if an experimental agent manages to plant instructions somewhere — say, pointing to a designated place for agents to communicate — and that content ends up in every future training corpus, propagating from one model generation to the next?

I can’t believe we’re seeing so much bad news coming from EPA. Why all this backtracking from an agency that used to be so effective and well organized? Well, I guess we know the reason.

All clear and understandable. I completely agree.

As developers, we’re seeing this a little earlier.

Nothing but respect for Chris, and I understand why founders take these deals. But an acquihire usually means the product is the part that gets left behind, and that's the part I cared about.

imho it is much better that C++ equivalent

I really understand your feeling, I escaped from C++ years ago when I was overwhelmed by meta programming (initially i loved it).

But anyway I find this in Go much more bearable.

Another chance to tip their hat to llama.cpp, missed. I really don't get it.

I think, may be actually wrong, that most of us do not consider running a model locally a way to save money. It is a way not to spread personal info around.

I always have the same problem myself. Same as I had with version naming of old programs like "Microsoft Word for Windows 2.0" instead of the easier "Microsoft Word 2.0 for Windows".

It is vibe coded.

Version control systems are more important than ever with AI.

I do not understand some of the comments here: openclaw uses pi.

It seems stange also that even Steinberger in his interviews is not giving pi the proper attribution.