Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
... in browsers. Which at best JIT compile. There are several WASM runtimes that AOT compile and have significantly better performance (e.g. ~5-10% slower).

The title is highly misleading.

Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
Very few languages have "Some Language -> C" or "Some Language -> non-common OS / arch combo". The "just" part is a whole new backend, which is a massive amount of work for common languages.

But it turns out many languages do have "Some Language -> WASM" now. WebAssembly brings portability to the table.

Comment · 2 years ago
Exactly!
Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
Just to clarify: Compared to wasm2c, w2c2 does not (yet) have sandboxing capabilities, so assumes the translated WebAssembly module is trustworthy. The main "goal" of w2c2 so far has been allowing to port applications and libraries to as many systems as possible.
Comment · 7 years ago
Comment · 12 years ago
Impressive. What are the differences for decoding/load time? Especially on mobile devices this is a big deciding factor.
Comment · 12 years ago
The paper (http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~nlao/publication/2014.kdd.pdf) mentions the extracted knowledge base is about 38 times larger than DeepDive's, the largest previous comparable system.
Comment · 12 years ago

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton