tumetab1

I might think this is not effective, but I fully agree with an author to state its intent.

Copyright was fully intended to allow authors to control how their work is used.

I sympathize with the sentiment but the suggested/implied guidance to fix bugs is wrong.

The overall game is increasing costs to exploit so much that attackers give up. Fixing 10 most obvious bugs, just very slightly increases costs, they would just a few more tokens to find another bug.

As someone said "I had infinite bugs, I fixed 1000, I still have infinite bugs".

To significantly increase exploit costs software/security has -1 years to do:

- Defense in Depth - Sandbox everything - Zero trust - Canary tokens - Split data from code (lol) - App Whitelisting - Reduce attack surface - Etc.

In other words, the only path is investing heavily on the "game changers" we have already discovered... but we are too cheap/lazy/coward/incompetent to apply.

And if we feel specially brave, changing the liability laws regarding software. Open Source & Proprietary code is so crappy because no gets jailed or fined when one of its dumb decisions results in millions of people have their data stolen.

It doesn't.

The more realistic claim it does not affect output quality.

Anthropic and fanboys defend that choosing "overcast" over "cloudy" does not affect a text quality.

Clearly, money and ambition clouds their judgment.

> They could just call them a criminal organization seeking directly, or indirectly, to contribute to violence for political ends

Most jurisdictions will prosecute you under terrorism laws for that.

The "adjectives" (far-left) are there just explain to the public what kind of terrorism they are talking about.

I'm not sure the "anti-geo-fencing" rules will not collide with this in the near future.

The EU constantly pushes that either you sell to all EU-member-states at the same price or nothing at all.

> For apps distributed via alternative app marketplaces or the web, Apple will charge a 5 percent Core Technology Commission.

Would it better a payment commission (free apps do not pay but apple takes a cut on everything) or would it better to an installment fee (pay X euros per installation but no commission cut for Apple) ?

Well everything depends on the fee/commission values but after I put the pitch fork down I was left wondering...

If you connect the dots of the earlier MCP Client/Server docs you understand that your desktop AI tool was also a MCP Server. This MCP Server provided the tools like "search files", "alter files", "open file".

It's was simpler to design/implement the AI tool if these interactions had state. When this was generalized to internet interactions this no longer made sense and was gradually cleaned up.

I think at the same time, the AI tool "protocol" to interact with the local system moved away from MCP model.

Which elephant?

You expect to discuss ideas with a mob? :)

It's like the meme of nuclear energy help with climate change and the answer is "I don't want to solutions, I want to abolish capitalism!"

> Also they are anti EU and NATO. Lot of astroturfing here.

At the same time, that big advertising and crony politicians are fighting to impose digital ID for all internet communications... one of the strongest privacy advocates is being attacked with non-sense.

Expect EFF to be bought or attacked.

> Being anti-immigration in a country that is shrinking is just stupid.

No, it's not.

Most people agree that immigration over X% amount is undesirable.

Many governments ignored people's will for many years.

Some new political parties want to fix that, is reasonable enough.