tomputer
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
The Domain Name you have entered is not available. It has been taken down as a result of dispute resolution proceedings pursuant to the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS).
The fritz.box name servers also point to URS[2] name servers:
Name Server: ursns1.viagenie.ca
Name Server: ursns2.viagenie.ca
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20240305162200/https://fritz.box...>> Looks like that Homebrew users (both macOS and Linux, both Intel and ARM) are unlikely affected?
> Correct. Though we do not appear to be affected, this revert was done out of an abundance of caution.
As long as the private key is stored/handled safely and RSA/ECC is not broken, it is not vulnerable.
I do agree that key rotation is better/recommended practice.
> a single leaked private key means your entire site is compromised
The leak is the actual vulnerability. As long as the leak is still there and you are not aware of the compromised private key, a fresh new private key will probably leak again.
However, the chances of leaking may be greater if a private key has to be used in multiple locations.
Then it is interesting that, with gold being less valuable nowdays than fiat money, central banks (or countries) are still the largest buyers of gold.
For normal internet browsing the single ISDN connection (64 kbps) was enough. Then later in 1999, Napster[2] launched and I was hooked! This made me use bundling ISDN channels quite a lot. Because of the cheaper tariffs, weekends where great because I enabled the bundling around midnight until early in the morning, so my parents wouldn't notice. :-)
I was on ISDN until 2002, when ADSL was available here and we could be online 24/7 for a fixed price. I do remember my ISP (XS4ALL) still had a fair-use-policy for downloading, which they removed a few years later.
[1] https://www.acm.nl/en/publications/publication/9213/OPTA-agr...
Source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1980994/000143774923...
Those who believe it can not work are most probably not invested. Those who believe it can work are most probably invested.
If Bitcoin would be used as a store of value instead of gold, gold can be used for other material purposes for a lower price. The same goes for real estate. A house does not have to be an investment asset or store of value. If (institutional) investors would use Bitcoin instead of housing, it could make housing affordable again. Or at least result in more fair/realistic housing market instead of the propped up market from the last few years.
Compared to gold and real estate, Bitcoin is a scarce asset that can easily be divided into small pieces. It has a liquid market and can be exchanged 24/7 anywhere in the world.
Does every layperson have to adopt stocks or commodities? Are these also dead if a layperson does not adopt it?
[1] https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/98423
[2] https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Seed_phrase#Two-factor_seed_phras...
Nextcloud CEO Frank Karlitschek well summarized it:
“I don't think Gaia-X has a future. It's basically a paper monster that will exist but will not have any impact in the market, unfortunately."
https://www.theregister.com/AMP/2024/01/08/gaiax_future/