tompagenet2
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
https://blog.emojipedia.org/correcting-the-record-on-the-fir...
---
The reassignment of Brachiosaurus brancai to its own genus occurred through a series of steps by different paleontologists:
## Initial Classification In 1914, Werner Janensch first described the African species as Brachiosaurus brancai, considering it part of the existing Brachiosaurus genus[4].
## Path to Reclassification Gregory S. Paul made the first step toward separation in 1988 by proposing a subgenus classification, Brachiosaurus (Giraffatitan) brancai, after noticing significant skeletal differences[4][10].
George Olshevsky then elevated Giraffatitan to full genus status in 1991, though this change was largely disregarded by the scientific community at the time[4][10].
## Formal Establishment The definitive separation came in 2009 when Michael P. Taylor published a detailed study demonstrating 26 distinct osteological differences between the African and American species. This comprehensive analysis firmly established Giraffatitan as a separate genus, creating the combination Giraffatitan brancai[3][4]. From 2012 onward, most researchers have accepted this classification[10].
Citations: [1] https://svpow.com [2] https://svpow.com/2009/09/09/brachiosaurus-brancai-is-not-br... [3] https://www.miketaylor.org.uk/dino/pubs/taylor2009/Taylor200... [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giraffatitan [5] https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/dino-directory/giraffatitan.h... [6] https://svpow.com/2025/02/14/if-you-believe-in-artificial-in... [7] https://www.jurassic-pedia.com/brachiosaurus-altithorax-sf/ [8] https://blog.everythingdinosaur.com/blog/_archives/2023/03/1... [9] https://dinomuseum.ca/2019/05/your-brachiosaurus-is-not-a-br... [10] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brachiosaurus [11] http://www.extinctblog.org/extinct/tag/Wilhelm+von+Branca [12] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1671/039.029.0309 [13] https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/a-baby-brachio... [14] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3045712/ [15] https://boasblogs.org/dcntr/the-brachiosaurus-brancai-in-the... [16] https://www.museumfuernaturkunde.berlin/en/visit/exhibitions... [17] https://thepaintpaddock.wordpress.com/brachiosaurus-altithor... [18] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242264129_A_ReEvalu... [19] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02724634.2011.5... [20] https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app68/app011052023.... [21] https://blog.everythingdinosaur.com/blog/_archives/2008/06/2... [22] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brachiosaurus
---
Of course any cause or point can and likely will be distorted, and some will be performative. There are also, e.g. performative people who like to moan about lefties in universities, but this kind of low effort behaviour doesn't in itself undermine reasonable criticism about e.g. universities sometimes being too intolerant of free speech.
My point is this is fairly lazy. It starts assuming woke, which I note the author agrees is often used perjoratively (and therefore is surely used in a specific loaded way, in the same way if I call someone a piece of shit I'm not generally using it to praise the human body's ability to excrete waste effectively), is some performative nonsense and not wondering or being curious whether there's something useful or at least sincere underneath that.
This would all be fine if there was a bit more thoughtful distinction and critical appraisal of the author's work, and he wasn't treated with such uncritical reverence.
[0] https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/509520497