Recent submissions

Comment · 3 years ago
I wish the e/acc guys would work on this instead of boring b2b productivity services lol
Comment · 3 years ago
I heard it has a simp infestation
Comment · 3 years ago
It’s a pretty good site!
Comment · 3 years ago
Luckily, barely any startups actually have revenue.
Comment · 3 years ago
Bailing out the depositors is bailing out the VCs who own the depositors.
Comment · 3 years ago
All of these companies could have sold their uninsured deposits at a discount, made payroll, and let their equity holders take the loss. This is what equity holders are supposed to do. Instead they went on an embarrassing twitter begging campaign and unfortunately succeeded. The whole "workers missing mortgage payments" or "destroying a generation of innovation" is an insane, buck-passing take.
Comment · 3 years ago
They went around begging for bailouts when they could have just had the companies sell the uninsured deposit claims at a discount, paid their workers, and, as equity, eaten the loss.
Comment · 3 years ago
What innocent? They could have sold the uninsured deposits at a discount, made payroll, and let the equity eat the loss. Instead they went on an embarrassing bailout begging extravaganza and unfortunately succeeded. Nobody, ever, should take any of these people seriously again.
Comment · 3 years ago
"If the bank collapses then many startups shut down."

No, the equity gets wiped out, and if it's a good idea/good business it persists and gets funding elsewhere.

"You say it's a bunch of rich people profiting. Who are these rich people you're talking about? Bank management? They went to zero overnight. Shareholders? zero. Who's left? Garry Tan? He has the same incentives as millions of Americans whose retirement savings are parked in VC funds."

The VCs and other equity holders of the SVB depositors. Financial markets work: they could have sold their uninsured deposits at a discount, made payroll, with equity eating the loss.

Comment · 3 years ago
There was plenty of private capital ready to step in and buy these deposits, at a discount of course, making it possible to make payrolls. You and your ilk just didn't like that the equity holders would have to eat the loss. Stop pretending this is about anything else.
Comment · 3 years ago
This is incorrect. Payroll pierces the corporate veil.
Comment · 3 years ago
It's an impossible standard to hold founders to know that deposits are insured up to $250,000? This isn't exactly fine print. Just be minimally competent and not a clown.
Comment · 3 years ago
"Equity is when you take risks, except for the risks you didn't anticipate"

Absurd take.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton