tlivolsi

Because the hardware is good, and some people want to run Linux instead of macOS on it.

I take it you attend a FSSP or ICKSP church?

That is what I meant. Thanks. I updated my comment.

One doesn't need to consult a pediatrician to look at the nutrition table. Even wealthy, intelligent people I know consume highly-processed garbage on a regular basis without thinking twice about what they put in their bodies.

I don't need a classified document to tell me what I can see with my own two eyes.

I just looked it up, and that does appear to be the case.

How much will the predicted spending on entitlements increase alongside this predicted GDP increase? More people = more entitlement spending, which is a serious long-term problem that needs to be addressed.

What are you talking about? Criticism comes with the territory of being the CEO of a company. A CEO is going to receive the blame or accolades for a company depending on whether it fails or succeeds. People largely perceive Mozilla to be a declining company. So, yes, she is naturally going to receive the blame for that. What also comes with the territory is massive compensation.

Thank goodness. Mitchell Baker was running Mozilla into the ground while stuffing her pockets.

>Doubling down on our core products, like Firefox...

The fact that they acknowledged Firefox at all gives me some hope.

Nvidia has a "monopoly" on the graphics card market because of Cuda. AMD's hardware is catching up, but until there is a Cuda alternative, Nvidia will continue to dominate.

It doesn't, but outsourcing isn't a thing that happens in this area of focus, especially at a national laboratory.

Elon Musk