tkgally
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
I wonder if they are incorporating AI in their workflows.
In 2019, I published online an anthology of writing from 19th- and early-20th-century books at the Internet Archive [1, 2]. I started with the IA’s OCR versions of the texts, but they were riddled with errors and I had to do extensive manual clean-up. I didn’t trust myself to catch all of the mistakes, so I ended up paying someone else to do an additional proofreading pass.
Over the past couple of years, I have done occasional experiments to see how well the current AI models could do such work. One of my test cases has been the 1821 novel Life in London by Pierce Egan [3]. It has complex text and page formatting, with extensive use of italics, small caps, footnotes, footnotes to footnotes (!), poetry, etc.
Earlier this year, I had Claude create a digital version of Life in London using Gemini 3.1 Pro through OpenRouter for the OCR, with further semantic checks by Sonnet 4.6. The results [4], while not good enough for Project Gutenberg, were still a big improvement over my tests a year earlier. I am guessing that it would be possible to get even closer to PG quality using more recent models.
[1] https://www.gally.net/jatsi/index.html
[2] https://archive.org/details/japan-as-they-saw-it
[3] https://archive.org/details/cu31924090015722/page/n56/mode/1...
But whenever my adult daughter shows my six-year-old grandson something on her Macbook, he immediately tries touching the screen and is confused when it doesn’t respond. He doesn’t have any devices of his own yet, so his defaulting to touch is the result of very occasionally being allowed to use an adult’s smartphone or tablet.
Child’s First Reader (1904?)
https://archive.org/details/childsfirstreade00pitm/page/72/m...
A Plea for Alphabetic Reform (c1905)
https://archive.org/details/pleaforalphabeti00pitm/page/n3/m...
Simplified Spelling for the Use of Government Departments (1906)
https://archive.org/details/simplifiedspelli00simprich/page/...
The Problem of Spelling Reform (1906)
https://archive.org/details/problemofspellin00skearich/page/...
The Fonetic Primer Offering the Universal Alfabet and the Science of Spelling (c1907)
https://archive.org/details/foneticprimeroff00storrich/mode/...
English Spelling and Spelling Reform (1909)
https://archive.org/details/englishspellings00loun/page/n5/m...
Simplified Spelling (1911)
https://archive.org/details/cu31924027251341/page/n5/mode/2u...
Handbook of Simplified Spelling (1920)
https://archive.org/details/handbookofsimpli00simprich/page/...
The original idea to ask for clocks came from Claude itself. After Opus 5.5 was released, I asked it for ideas for interesting projects to try, and clocks was one of its suggestions. Some of the later prompts included suggested themes, but those came from Opus, too.
The only instructions that originated with me were striving for variety, making the page self-contained, randomizing the display sequence, and putting the clock names and explanations behind mouseovers/clicks. Even the controls at the top of the page were added by Opus on its own initiative.
I agree that Claude did tend to repeat certain themes. If someone wanted to extend the gallery to the thousands of clocks while maintaining the variety, they would probably need to seed the model with some original ideas. (Whether those ideas could come from a model or would need human taste is an interesting question.)
Also, Claude’s realizations of some of its ideas are a bit rough. If I wanted to create a standalone widget for a clock I particularly liked, I would spend more time with Claude (or another model) refining and polishing it first.
Nevertheless, considering that nearly all the ideas came from Opus and all the graphics are created with pure code, I remain impressed with what it was able to do.