timost

Thank you for your answer !

I'm trying not to pick sides but here are a few arguments they oppose to these key points :

- Technological advancement : Although it does play a role, they measure power in long climbs to limit that bias. Speeds are lower so aero plays less of a role. Bikes were already as light or even lighter in the 2000s. They also calibrate their power predictions against riders of the peloton who publish their power on strava.

- Nutrition has indeed changed, it helps producing near max power efforts at the end of long stages (aka durability) but doesn't play a direct role on pure max power (VO2 max related) which is what they are worried about.

- Regarding training, I'm not really sure, I think the pro peloton already had access to power meters in the 2000s.

- Regarding testing, it's indeed quite frequent but it's not bullet proof.

- I think the history of the sport is so bad it's hard to see the half full glass.

It's now possible to use triple back quotes to create blocks in MS Teams

I'm curious about the switch from boltdb to SQLite. How should one handle migrating existing podman environments ?

Fixed in release 5.0.0

main changes: - new podman db will be SQLite, existing boltdb db remain supported. - podman machine has seen many rewrites - deprecated cgroupsv1 will raise warnings

Nice video, thank you. It's interesting to see how each technology behaves depending on the scale of the dataset. Duckdb is definitely killing it.