throwawaygod

Little harsh on the maintainer. But say if the author has the technical chops for creating successful? language but if the project is still vibecoded, will that be acceptable? Should we be excited of such projects?

Can you explain why? Non-american here :)

But they changed their goal from being a python superset to pythonish language with great python interoperability. The only other thing they could've done differently is making the language not look like python superficially. I think chris achieved his goal of creating a language which takes full advantage of MLIR and also not repeating some of the mistakes made with swift's development.

available for mentorship?

Can you expand on that a bit? What language do you use now?

What are you using now? how do you feel about clojure now?

Which service's free tier is so generous?

That may be true for a lot of families and friends as well. They may not dispose you outright but they will try to cut you off every chance they get.

The differences btwn new() and make() is even lesser now. Is the goal is to deprecate make()?

How is it holding up?

model name?

Whats the debugger story like? Do we have to use Microsoft's proprietary dotnet debugger?