throwaway84742

And yet he still has 4 billion dollars and is a president of the US. Must be pretty good at negotiating.

Trade negotiations are underway. This is a part of that, as was the initial ban. Trump does this again and again: he creates leverage in the form of negative consequences should he walk away from the table. Then he gives some of it back much to the relief of the other side, in exchange for something else he needs. He negotiated thousands of deals, some of which were very complicated. It could well be that he’s the strongest negotiator we ever had in that position.

We pay this much to strong PhDs with a good publication record. So do Google and FB. Must be able to code really well, though.

Competent big data folks still pull down $300-400k fairly easily. I’m talking about people who _really_ understand the field and have a track record, not “graduates with a degree”.

Au contraire, my friend, it’s only in the beginning of an upward hockey stick.

Not for top AI talent. That starts at $400k/yr

It could use spikes and/or go on all fours in “fast” mode. It’s whatever you design. My main point though is not mechanics, but the significantly lower reaction time. Given enough compute, the world that seems “real time” to us could appear to be slow as molasses to a robot. I think the natural thing to do would be to make it move at the speed that provides a good balance between accomplishing objectives and energy consumption. I think that this speed is much faster than what we’re used to with humans. For eg military robots that balance could be further tweaked in favor of quickly accomplishing objectives.

As Elon Musk quipped, in a few years this thing will move so fast you’ll need a strobe to see it. It’s not subject to the human reaction time or mechanical constraints.

Are you sure? This means the whole grant vests in 2.5 years. Their vesting period used to be much longer than that.

All of this is _very_ recent.

Not playing the money game is dangerous as well. Like it or not, money is a potent signaling mechanism. The more you’re able to charge, the better you’re treated, the easier it is to get access to “cool” jobs and projects, and the easier it is to throw in the towel on the shitty ones. I’m not even talking about things like compound interest and the peace of mind that comes with financial independence in your mid to late 30s, even just tactical considerations make it worthwhile to extract as much money as possible from the employers. After all, they do try to extract as much productivity from you as possible, so it’s only fair to reciprocate. There’s no shame in it, and pursuing meaningful work at the same time is far from mutually exclusive.

Didn’t know. Then, Microsoft, take notice. :-)

They are also not meant to do R&D. For one thing they don’t pay market rate, so their access to top talent is non-existent. For another, there’s no accountability and no “fear of death”, since the government essentially can’t run out of money. Why try to use resources wisely if you can just tax people, or if that doesn’t work, print more money, and thereby tax their children and grandchildren. No, I’d much rather this risk was compartmentalized.

Another issue is, you’re de facto giving the rest of the world a free ride on US taxpayer largesse. Even better free ride than what they’re getting now: paying a dime on the dollar for newest genetic drugs without spending any money on their development. I’d go along with that in the poor countries like India, but I see no reason whatsoever why I should be paying 5-6x as much as some dude in Western Europe, all while he tries to lecture me about their “free” healthcare. I’d much rather I paid less and they paid the same as me.

This sounds like an excellent way to burn a trillion dollars with no tangible result. Government == money black hole, with very few exceptions.